>>10584512 (LB)

>Q is just putting a huge spotlight on the JQ, again, which is great.

unless it's just a way to get the last bit of opposition silenced for good. what would be left? the filthy goy willing to serve their masters as designed, silenced from ever utting a word in disagreement? remember also the legislation the president signed into law regarding even the idea of the JQ. just look at Jared and Dersh and you begin to understand this might not be what you think it is, or hoped it would be.