Anonymous ID: 6f3527 Sept. 10, 2020, 5:15 a.m. No.10588088   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8169

>>10587988

>>10587988

<Why do all the satanic deceivers start their periscopes by lip-syncing like a total idiot?

 

<Hi Karli! We see you!

 

Q and Gen Flynn's brother mentioned Karli yesterday.

You glow faggot.

 

The periscope Karli was running prior to Q's Hello Karli

> https://www.pscp.tv/kbq225/1BdGYnoPXeYJX

 

Part of the scope was Karli saying

Plan accordingly [November].

Q

 

Backchannels open

 

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 110248 No.8736051 📁

Apr 9 2020 14:21:27 (EST)

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1208873492025925632📁

Do people really believe the biggest scandal in modern US history will go unpunished [Scot-Free]?

Backchannels are important.

Patriots stand at the ready [shills whine].

Q

Anonymous ID: 6f3527 Sept. 10, 2020, 5:49 a.m. No.10588273   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8513 >>8578

>>10588193

>mattis may be the first domino to drop

On Mattis note, decided to research a bit about Hussein firing Mattis.

 

Trump lashed back. the fake news is so retarded with their spin

 

TRUMP: “Probably the only thing Barack Obama & I have in common is that we both had the honor of firing Jim Mattis,the world’s most overrated General.” — tweet Wednesday.

 

article on Hussein Firing

https://archive.is/Tflj1#selection-8287.132-8287.254

Mattis made famous in Iraq the phrase, "No better friend, no worse enemy."The Obama White House should keep that in mind.

 

The Obama administration’s inexplicable mishandling of Marine Gen. James Mattis

 

By Thomas E. Ricks

January 18, 2013

 

Word on the national security street is that General James Mattis is being given the bum’s rush out of his job as commander of Central Command, and is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.

Why the hurry?Pentagon insiders say that he rubbed civilian officials the wrong way— not because he went all "mad dog," which is his public image, and the view at the White House, but rather because he pushed the civilians so hard on considering the second- and third-order consequences of military action against Iran. Some of those questions apparently were uncomfortable. Like, what do you do with Iran once the nuclear issue is resolved and it remains a foe? What do you do if Iran then develops conventional capabilities that could make it hazardous for U.S. Navy ships to operate in the Persian Gulf? He kept saying, "And then what?"

Inquiry along these lines apparently was not welcomed — at least in the CENTCOM view. The White House view, apparently, is that Mattis was too hawkish, which is not something I believe, having seen him in the field over the years. I’d call him a tough-minded realist, someone who’d rather have tea with you than shoot you, but is happy to end the conversation either way.

Presidents should feel free to boot generals anytime they want, of course — that’s our system, and one I applaud. But ousting Mattis at this time, and in this way, seems wrong for several reasons:

TIMING: If Mattis leaves in March, as now appears likely, that means there will be a new person running CENTCOM just as the confrontation season with Iran begins to heat up again.

CIVIL-MILITARY SIGNALS: The message the Obama Administration is sending, intentionally or not, is that__ it doesn’t like tough, smart, skeptical generals who speak candidly to their civilian superiors__. In fact, that is exactly what it (and every administration) should want. Had we had more back in 2003, we might not have made the colossal mistake of invading Iraq.

SERVICE RELATIONS: The Obamites might not recognize it, but they now have dissed the two Marine generals who are culture heroes in today’s Corps: Mattis and Anthony Zinni. The Marines have long memories. I know some who are still mad at the Navy for steaming away from the Marines left on Guadalcanal. Mattis made famous in Iraq the phrase,"No better friend, no worse enemy." The Obama White House should keep that in mind.

I’m still a fan of President Obama. I just drove for two days down the East Coast listening to his first book, and enjoyed it enormously. But I am at the point where I don’t trust his national security team. They strike me as politicized, defensive and narrow. These are people who will not recognize it when they screw up, and will treat as enemies anyone who tells them they are doing that. And that is how things like Vietnam get repeated. Harsh words, I know. But I am worried.

Anonymous ID: 6f3527 Sept. 10, 2020, 6:34 a.m. No.10588513   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8544

>>10588499

wrong link

 

meant >>10588273

 

>he going 3d chess on him

He (Mattis) on him (Hussein)

 

but rather because he pushed the civilians so hard on considering the second- andthird-order consequences of military action against Iran. Some of those questions apparently were uncomfortable. Like, what do you do with Iran once the nuclear issue is resolved and it remains a foe? What do you do if Iran then develops conventional capabilities that could make it hazardous for U.S. Navy ships to operate in the Persian Gulf? He kept saying, "And then what?"

Anonymous ID: 6f3527 Sept. 10, 2020, 6:46 a.m. No.10588575   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10588544

>anon withdraws hasty condemnation; adopts lurk mode in this matter; repents of being triggered by muh headline.

kek

 

Potus talking about Mattis like he has about Sessions

Anonymous ID: 6f3527 Sept. 10, 2020, 7:02 a.m. No.10588643   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8655

>>10588489

>Mattis

 

What authority does POTUS have specifically over the Marines?

 

Focus on the power of POTUS as it relates to the Marines.

 

Can the NG work in coordination w/ the marines?

 

How many Marines volunteered to serve Hussein during his term?