>>10584684 (lb)
Yup.
This is an ongoing issue for the "never Trump" crowd, and it's something that keeps rearing it's head. The fact that the DOJ stepped in makes it seem suspicious as hell, too.The other chick that opened and closed 2 cases, one under anonymity, was an obvious flake. This one, though, is an optics problem that won't go away.
Now, of course we know he didn't. But with the DOJ taking it on makes it look bad. Unless they have something they can use to expose her and possibly bring charges against her after they get the case figured out.
Anon, she's a parody. She calls herself "mini AOC". Complete satire.
Yup.
>anons opine on Q's Karli callout
I think it's safe to say it was a simple "Hello, and thank you." Anons gettin' all speculatey an shiet over nothing, methinks.
Um, no. She/He is not who they claim to be, which is something they likely never were, and will never offer proof of, either.
-
Makes outlandish claims.
-
Misses the mark on many.
-
Insults their followers.
-
Deflects any argument to "do more research".
Many of it's followers are also bots. She/He's definitely not worth the follow; but good luck, anon. Just use discernment.
>Karli
Q typed Karli, Q meant Karli. If Q wanted to shout out to Karl Rove, Q would have said Karl Rove.
Anons… Re-read crumbs.
That's because they don't seem to get it.
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 28b403 No.4400956 📁
Dec 20 2018 21:02:56 (EST)
Rogers departure. Intel.
Sessions departure. Law.
Kelly departure. Warfare/MIL
Mattis departure. Warfare/MIL
Notice a pattern?
Q
Let's pretend we know something about strategy for a second, and realize that Mattis is baiting the absolute fuck out of green suiters thinking @POTUS is bad for USA. How else would you out all the non-patriots not fit to serve in our beloved military?
It's fucking brilliant.
Why is James Woods being a pussy all of a sudden? Or is this defeatist take meant to rile folks up?
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1303906694976634880
@RealJamesWoods
This is why Trump can’t win.
To be fair, if it wasn't fooling the absolute fuck out of everyone, it wouldn't be working. That goes for either side of the coin.
In that instance, I think @POTUS was talking about something else. Check this out:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4783265/
Anon, the pic in Wood's post is vote by internet. Check that shit out.