‘Star Trek’ Star Anthony Rapp Sues Kevin Spacey on Sex Assault Allegation

Embattled actor Kevin Spacey faces more legal trouble, this time from Star Trek actor Anthony Rapp and an anonymous accuser who filed a lawsuit claiming Spacey sexually assaulted them when they were teens. In a lawsuit, the two accusers say that Spacey assaulted them when they were 14-year-old boys looking to get into the acting business. Rapp, who appeared in the previous season of Star Trek: Discovery, had previously accused Spacey of “trying to seduce” him when he was young. Now he has revealed more details of what he claims the House of Cards star did to him in 1986, according to The Wrap. The one-time Rent cast member accuses Spacey of pushing him onto a bed and climbing on top of him before he was able to “squirm” away when he was at Spacey’s apartment for a party. Rapp was 14, and Spacey was 26 at the time. Spacey had released a response to Rapp’s claims saying in a statement, “If I did behave then as he describes, I owe him the sincerest apology for what would have been deeply inappropriate drunken behavior,”

The second party to Rapp’s lawsuit, who is going only by the initials C.D., says Spacey acted inappropriately after having first met him during a 1981 acting class. C.D. says that in 1983, when he was only 14, Spacey invited him to his apartment, where the two had a sexual encounter. C.D. further claims the pair had sexual encounters several more times until the last time when he says he rejected Spacey and fled from the famed actor’s apartment. Spacey has faced a litany of legal woes after being outed by the #MeToo movement in 2016. The actor was sued by a man who said Spacey groped him at the Club Car in 2016 when he was a 16-year-old busboy. However, by July of 2019, the young man had dropped his lawsuit. But that same month, British police officials revealed that they had flown to the U.S. to interview Spacey about allegations of abuse alleged overseas. British officials were investigating six sexual abuse claims alleged to have occurred between 2004 and 2015 when Spacey was running London’s Old Vic Theater. Old Vic officials later claimed to have examined 20 allegations of sexual assault and they had urged 14 individuals to report their cases to the police.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/09/10/star-trek-star-anthony-rapp-sues-kevin-spacey-on-sex-assault-allegation/

Kevin Spacey Accused of Sexually Assaulting Two 14-Year-Old Boys in New Lawsuit

https://www.thewrap.com/kevin-spacey-accused-sexual-assault-14-year-old-boys/

Kevin Spacey is sued by Star Trek actor Anthony Rapp and an anonymous accuser who claim he sexually assaulted them as minors in the 1980s

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8715235/Kevin-Spacey-sued-alleged-assault-battery-1980s-Rapp-person.html

British Police Travelled to the U.S. to interview Kevin Spacey About Sexual Assault Allegations

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/07/06/british-police-travelled-u-s-to-interview-kevin-spacey-about-sexual-assault-allegations/

Media Continues To Conflate Positive Test Results As New “Cases”

Forgets Reporting That Upwards Of 90% Of COVID-19 Test Results May Be Inaccurate

Great Game India recently published an article written by Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, doctor and author who works as a General Practitioner in the National Health Service in England. That article – “The Coronavirus Mathematical Blunder That Plunged The World Into Chaos & Lockdown” – addresses the mathematical errors that occurred early on in the coronavirus crisis. “When you strip everything else out, the reason for lockdown comes from a single figure: one percent. This was the prediction that COVID, if left unchecked, would kill around one percent of us.” Dr. Kendrick explains that two different fatality rate figures were mixed up: First, there’s the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR). This is the total number of people who are infected by a disease and the number of them who die. This figure includes those who have no symptoms at all, or only very mild symptoms – those who stayed at home, coughed a bit and watched Outbreak. Then there’s the Case Fatality Rate (CFR). This is the number of people suffering serious symptoms, who are probably ill enough to be in (a) hospital. Clearly, people who are seriously ill – the “cases” – are going to have a higher mortality rate than those who are infected, many of whom don’t have symptoms. Put simply – all cases are infections, but not all infections are cases. Which means that the CFR will always be far higher than the IFR. With influenza, the CFR is around ten times as high as the IFR. COVID seems to have a similar proportion. So, they matched up the one percent CFR of COVID with the incorrect 0.1 percent CFR of flu. Suddenly, COVID was going to be ten times as deadly. world, panicked. Because they were told COVID was going to be ten times worse than influenza. They could see three million deaths in the US alone, and 70 million around the world. If influenza killed 50, COVID was going to kill 500. If influenza killed a million, COVID was going to get 10 million. No wonder Congress, then the world, panicked. Because they were told Covid was going to be ten times worse than influenza. They could see three million deaths in the US alone, and 70 million around the world. On February 28 it was estimated that COVID was going to have about the same impact as a bad influenza season – almost certainly correct. Eleven days later, the same group of experts predicted that the mortality rate was going to be ten times as high. This was horribly, catastrophically… wrong.

To restate: Positive test results do not indicate a COVID-19 case. Additionally, AND Magazine and others – including The New York Times – have reported that upwards of 90% of false COVID-19 tests likely should NOT be considered positive. This does not include inaccurate lab results – where labs in Florida and elsewhere had extremely high positive COVID test results. This is the CDC saying that the testing threshold for COVID-19 was never properly set for all of these tests. How can anyone – the public or even doctors and health officials – actually know what is going on when the testing is now reported to be this faulty. How are parents supposed to evaluate whether their children should be in “in-person” school? Whether they or their children should wear masks? Colleges are sending home students because “large numbers” have tested positive. Are they symptomatic? Perhaps we should be reporting on actual cases, as we have done in the past – those who are symptomatic and being treated for COVID-19 symptoms whether in a doctor’s office or hospital setting.

https://andmagazine.com/talk/2020/09/10/media-continues-to-conflate-positive-test-results-as-new-cases/

>>10596249

Indeed all for a mail in election..which will not happen, most people are in favor of placing their vote in person.