as a reply there is less blocking.
are you talking about making it a reply?
>>10596046,
>>10596051,
>>10596061,
Wasn't that from years ago?
nytimes is so full of shit
It's gotta be about gender
The "female angle" written by a female.
so predictable
Isn't that sexist to say they "fall for Q"
like they are too stupid to know better.
They wouldn't say that about men
The men are "falling" for Q
no.
Fuck them. hypocrites as usual
Just like they call blacks who disobey their thought police "uncle tom" women are ditzy who "fall" for Q?
sensitive subject is that they are fucking nazi who didn't lose the last war that we were told they lost.
and are still fucking up our planet
& are the virus; are the global warming.
Any problem can be solved
but they like the problems and so block the solutions, as the Democrats are doing right now
If we have power they can't control us to the extent they would care to
They further the suffering deliberately. Their agenda;