>>10603427 pb

go to Simon Shacks site for that

But be careful, he and his cult are a hang-out

http://septemberclues.info/

His race car driving brother is sponsored by bin Laden family. You'd know he was a fraud anyway, if you studied it enough.

He claims there was no one in the Towers and the the images of peeps jumping were CGI

That ^^^^ I disagree. I found witnesses who saw them jumping, and they weren't dolls being thrown off the bld.

The guys a joke, Anyone who questions him or who disagrees are thown off his site. Some of the best researchers on 9/11 were banned from there. He has his slavish fans and acoylites who better be careful they don't say the wrong thing and get banned. He also viciously attacks real researchers as does "AJ" -

"Shack" (fake name) is a Swedish guy living in Rome?

>>10602997 pb

>>10602867 pb

>>10603402 pb

there's was no sign of a aircraft crash at the Shanksville site.

>>10603569

The pictures of the fake smoke out of the Towers could easily have been "easter egg" created to take people off course?

Could also have shown that on TV and no one would've noticed.

Shack claims that everything - the images of the collapse, was CGI

(Which I did get some proof for, when I compared an amateur photo from Battery Park to the TV images)

But I am uncertain if every single vid was faked. Why? Why would they need to? It's all "in your face" anyway - and nobody sees it afterall. Why bother?

I think more likely Shack's evidence is deliberate to muddy the waters, cause confusion for people who have little time to look over the evidence and

THINK

So it's possible thought many ringers were planted, to cause easy "gotcha" moment should the necessity arise?

The vids were so shitty, on purpose

Camera and film were so much more advanced at the time than what they show.

The Shack people also claim there was a EMP which took out everyone's phone - blocking amateur recording.

If that was the case, and I doubt it, why did the FBI go around collecting everybodies images from the neighborhood and not giving them back?

Maybe there was an IMP? It's unknown.

But I believe that would've been un-necessary also?

Who knows?

But I do knoe that, people claiming to be FBI went "house to house", making everyone give up their photos, asking around in the neighborhood who had photos

"terrorism investigation" doncha know

• not even right away but some years later (too?) They did that to start as well. Putting everybody's material up on "Planet.. (something)"

I know at the JFK killing they did the same thing. Confiscated all film of bystanders, so they could have the "official version" record.

How'd that work out for them , 50 years on?

>>10603567

FEMA made thousands and thousands of Propaganda images.

You could download them all at one time.

>>10603825

>>10603567

>>10603825

in the past couple years a very selected "cache" of photos was released.

not sure if these were from that, or not.

>>10603853

Now looking at them they weren't?

i think these were part of the original group

A few of these by professional photog

>>10603939

Wonder how much that cost?

>>10603978

This one shows the clip of alleged amateur Courchesne from Canada and is CGI

He's an academic and an artist who presented a paper on "Art as Crime" in 1999.

The clip shows the typical swinging around of the camera to disorient the viewer. Slow it down frame by frame and see what you see?

>>10604023

>>10603936

They think it's funny

JOKERS