>>10607683 PB

>The two main reasons I can’t logically believe Sullivan is serious about seeing Flynn found guilty is because: 1. There was nothing wrong with Flynn calling Russian Ambassador, as he was Trump’s NSA. 2. Flynn was accused of lying about sanctions; however, sanctions were never mentioned in the call (he did mention reciprocity, but no mention of sanctions specifically).

Flushing out the team of prosecutors and their corruption is possible from the vantage point that Sullivan possesses today, athismomentintime. Not a firewall. Edges of the fire where prey find easy pickings.