It's okay, I hate when that happens! They will remove it, anon. Don't think too much about it and we know you meant to encourage us to contribute to POTUS! Your good deed is the focus and it will be remembered. Thank you! Keep calm and carry on!
The explaination of how they found and traced his email address is awful and for what? What did they accomplish by all this doxxing and taking map offline. Nothing. Stupid people.
I hope karma doesn't wait too long to bite this Bloomberg bro in the butt.
Pretty funny the photo they decided to run.
Court Rules Defendant Must Disclose Phone Password to Police and Prosecution in First Ruling of its Kind in State
BY MARIKA MALAEA ON 10/17/19 AT 11:01 PM EDT
The Oregon Court of Appeals made a first-of-its-kind ruling in the state on Wednesday when it affirmed a lower court's decision that the forced disclosure of a defendant's phone passcode was not a violation of her Fifth Amendment rights.
Catrice Pittman crashed her car into a tree in June 2016, leaving an adult friend and five children, ages 2 to 10, with wounds that included internal injuries and broken bones. According to the prosecution, she admitted to using meth that night, The Oregonian reported.
Pittman pleaded guilty to driving under the influence of intoxicants and five counts of second- and third-degree assault. Another charge that the prosecution had been pursuing and hoping to reinforce with evidence from Pittman's iPhone was that she was allegedly dealing methamphetamine. That charge was later dismissed.
A Marion County judge sided with police and prosecutors by ordering Pittman to enter her passcode, and on Wednesday, the Oregon Court of Appeals agreed with that ruling.
Her defense attorney argued forcing her to do so would violate her rights against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article 1 Section 12 of the Oregon Constitution.
But the Court of Appeals ruled that because police already had good reason to believe the phone was hers given its location in her purse, the fact that she knew its passcode was already a "foregone conclusion." In other words, she could be compelled to cooperate as an exception to her constitutional rights.
The "foregone conclusion" standard keeps cropping up in cases like these. It allows prosecutors to bypass Fifth Amendment protections if the government can show that it knows that the defendant knows the passcode to unlock a device.
https://www.newsweek.com/court-rules-defendant-must-disclose-phone-password-police-prosecution-first-ruling-its-kind-1466112
Trooper Ryan Burke @wspd1pio
We got another one! Great job Trooper Morefield. A pedestrian decided to match light the grass at SR-512 and SR-7. Citizen observed and alerted 911. After a short foot chase, one is in custody and on his way to jail.