Anonymous ID: 34b91d Sept. 11, 2020, 7:49 p.m. No.10612015   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2189 >>2495 >>2564

A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7

 

This study is a landmark. Not sure why we aren't seeing more traction on it.

 

Published March 2020

 

This is a study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) — a 47-story building that suffered a total collapse at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001, following the horrible events of that morning. The objective of the study was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11, 2001; (2) Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3) Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

 

The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.

 

The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was aglobal failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

 

Regarding the early collapse of the penthouse:

 

>In addition, our analysis shows that the east penthouse collapsed only as far down as the upper 3 to 5 stories of the building….Since the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building appears to have had little effect on the structure other than causing the collapse of the east penthouse, we conclude that these failures were a separate and distinct event from the global collapse.

 

http://ine.uaf.edu/projects/wtc7/

 

Direct download to final report: https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf

 

Basically, NIST didn't properly model the building for their report, which allowed them to make such wild claims. See attached image for more details.