Anonymous ID: aef369 Sept. 11, 2020, 9:55 p.m. No.10613636   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3690 >>3693 >>3720 >>3743 >>3750 >>3804 >>3958 >>4126

>>10613579

>>10613434

again kek

look at this article at

what Trump was trting to do in 2017

Trump is funny

 

Eagles And Mockingbirds Catch A Break As Judge Strikes Down Federal Migratory Bird Opinion

 

By NPR News August 14, 2020 BY GABRIELA SALDIVIA

 

A federal judge in New York struck down a Trump administration decision to scale back U.S. government protections for migratory birds.

The change by the administration would have allowed companies that accidentally kill migratory birds during the course of their work no longer to face the possibility of criminal prosecution.

 

In a 31-page document, U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni cited the novel To Kill a Mockingbird to support her decision.

 

“It is not only a sin to kill a mockingbird, it is also a crime,” Caproni wrote.

 

“That has been the letter of the law for the past century. But if the Department of the Interior has its way, many mockingbirds and other migratory birds that delight people and support ecosystems throughout the country will be killed without legal consequence.”

 

An American bald eagle flies over Mill Pond in Centerport, N.Y., in 2018. The bald eagle is one of the birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Bruce Bennett/Getty Images

An American bald eagle flies over Mill Pond in Centerport, N.Y., in 2018. The bald eagle is one of the birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

CREDIT: Bruce Bennett/Getty Images

 

Just before leaving office, the Obama administration issued a legal opinion saying that the Migratory Bird Treaty Act does include the incidental killing of birds. In 2017, the Trump administration suspended that opinion pending review. Later it released a legal memo saying it would not criminally prosecute such killings.

 

Caproni was clear in her ruling, striking down the administration’s interpretation of “takings” and “killings” of birds as applicable only if the animals are targeted specifically.

 

“There is nothing in the text of the [Migratory Bird Treaty Act] that suggests that in order to fall within its prohibition, activity must be directed specifically at birds,” Caproni said. “Nor does the statute prohibit only intentionally killing migratory birds. And it certainly does not say that only ‘some’ kills are prohibited.”

 

In 2018, the National Audubon Society and other conservation groups, along with eight states, filed lawsuits against the Trump administration’s legal opinion, which the court joined into one.

 

“This is a huge victory for birds and it comes at a critical time,” Sarah Greenberger, interim chief conservation officer for the National Audubon Society, said in a press release. “Science tells us that we’ve lost 3 billion birds in less than a human lifetime and that two-thirds of North American birds are at risk of extinction due to climate change.”

 

According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, tens of millions of birds every year are killed by human-caused threats, involving flying into communication towers and wind turbines, as well as oil spills.

 

Environmental groups assert that if the Trump administration’s legal opinion had been in place in 2010 when BP caused the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the company would have faced no consequences under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act for the 1 million birds killed.

 

“For decades this law has been a proven incentive to remind companies to do the right thing for wildlife,” Greenberger said.

 

Interior Department spokesperson Conner Swanson defended the administration rule change to The Washington Post on Tuesday.

 

“Today’s opinion undermines a common sense interpretation of the law and runs contrary to recent efforts, shared across the political spectrum, to decriminalize unintentional conduct,” Swanson wrote in an email to the Post.

 

The Department of the Interior did not respond to NPR’s request for comment in time for publication.

 

Critics of the century-old Migratory Bird Treaty Act, such as energy companies, have opposed the law as too broad, according to Reuters.

 

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act was enacted in 1918. Today, any violation of the act is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $15,000 and imprisonment for up to six months. The Fish and Wildlife Service keeps a list of birds protected by the law, including eagles, owls, mockingbirds and vultures.

Anonymous ID: aef369 Sept. 11, 2020, 10 p.m. No.10613693   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10613636

>>10613579 >>10613434

 

Mockingbirds and Owls and vultures

Eagles will continue to SOAR

 

THEY know their time fying free is SOON to end

read between the lines 2017 article.

even includes:

eagles, owls, mockingbirds and vultures.

 

>Later it released a legal memo saying it would not criminally prosecute such killings.

 

kekekekkkeee kek

 

Just before leaving office, the Obama administration issued a legal opinion saying that the Migratory Bird Treaty Act does include the incidental killing of birds. In 2017, the Trump administration suspended that opinion pending review. Later it released a legal memo saying it would not criminally prosecute such killings.

 

“This is a huge victory for birds and it comes at a critical time,” Sarah Greenberger, interim chief conservation officer for the National Audubon Society, said in a press release

Anonymous ID: aef369 Sept. 11, 2020, 10:02 p.m. No.10613720   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10613636

 

again 2017

Trump is truly funny

 

That has been the letter of the law for the past century. But if the Department of the Interior has its way, many mockingbirds and other migratory birds that delight people and support ecosystems throughout the country will be killed without legal consequence.”

Anonymous ID: aef369 Sept. 11, 2020, 10:04 p.m. No.10613743   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3750

>>10613636

>Caproni was clear in her ruling, striking down the administration’s interpretation of “takings” and “killings” of birds as applicable only if the animals are targeted specifically.

Anonymous ID: aef369 Sept. 11, 2020, 10:15 p.m. No.10613887   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10613730

YOU have time to post as an Anon and read our stuff

but we are in a WAR

and cannot/will not post FB shit because of

rules

yet FB is the enemy

do you see how retardedly brainwashed you appear

Anonymous ID: aef369 Sept. 11, 2020, 10:24 p.m. No.10614046   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4134 >>4168

>>10613652

that gold ball that made it to be photographed

 

masonic ORB symbology

 

the masonic orb cracks open

 

THAT was for THEM to laugh at us for believing it all

and for them all to see it was THEM

a kind of "product placement" for TV and Media

 

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=maonsic+orb&atb=v225-1&iax=images&ia=images

Anonymous ID: aef369 Sept. 11, 2020, 10:31 p.m. No.10614134   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4168

>>10614046

>>10613652

 

IT SO OBVIOUS THAT IT SURVIVED and you are now looking at THEM (it)

Their Masonic ORB to laugh at us for falling for their shit

 

World Trade Center Sphere: Sculpture That Survived 9/11 Faces Uncertain Future (PHOTOS) | HuffPost

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/world-trade-center-sphere-911-memorial-battery-park_n_1872779

 

World Trade Center Sphere: Sculpture That Survived 9/11 Faces Uncertain Future

 

Thursday, November 25, 2010

The World Trade Center Survivor – Fritz Koenig's "The Sphere"

http://daytoninmanhattan.blogspot.com/2010/11/world-trade-center-survivor-fritz.html

 

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=World+Trade+Center+Sphere%3A+Sculpture+That+Survived+9%2F11+Faces+Uncertain+Future+(PHOTOS)&atb=v225-1&ia=web