Anonymous ID: 000000 Sept. 12, 2020, 8:10 a.m. No.10617579   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10617543

You guys really don't see Kamalas face distorting and her reptile eyes? Someone do me a favor and just stare at kamalas face in this video and tell me if you don't see "it".

Anonymous ID: 000000 Sept. 12, 2020, 8:23 a.m. No.10617668   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I'm starting to understand postmodernism and the critical theory thanks to this video by Tom Woods:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiC3cJ5QJyI

 

However, what still puzzles me is how so many normies that have no real knowledge of anything relevant to the political debate just make up lies on the spot to support the mainstream narrative. Here are some examples that come to mind.

 

Years ago:

 

> "ISIS is just a political party in the Middle East. It has nothing to do with terrorism."

> "It is safe in the Middle East. It is basically the same there as in an American suburb."

 

A more recent example:

 

> "DAs letting Antifa and BLM protesters go without charges has nothing to do with politics."

> (In response to some details on a topic.) "You just made a blanket statement that doesn't really mean anything."

 

Somehow I don't remember more examples of this at the moment, but I think many people on this board experience this all the time.

 

Why would anyone think that just straight-up making stuff up on the spot would be an argument? What's the motivation behind this?

Anonymous ID: 000000 Sept. 12, 2020, 8:46 a.m. No.10617838   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Look at Gavin Newsom creepily smiling like a mass shooter or rapist while claiming that fires in California are caused by climate change.

 

https://youtu.be/xkDDRev1Ui8?t=61