I guess then that this is not an "official" photograph taken at the White House with Renegade & Antifa leader.
So, an "unofficial" photograph taken at the White House with Renegade/Community Organizer & Antifa leader.
https://www.rightjournalism.com/photos-allegedly-shows-prominent-antifa-member-from-dc-with-barack-obama-in-the-white-house/
And with Mattis, fudge is involved.
Christians have known how evil the papacy is for 1700 years.
How it is the religion of Babylon, that eventually moved to Rome.
Hell, the pope even has the twitter handle @pontifex, the title Nimrod claimed as he built the Tower of Babel. Pontifex Maximus, the Greatest Bridge Builder.
John's one of the few people with the balls to say it out loud.
The Obama administration’s inexplicable mishandling of Marine Gen. James Mattis
Word on the national security street is that General James Mattis is being given the bum’s rush out of his job as commander of Central Command, and is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned. Why the hurry? Pentagon insiders say that he rubbed civilian officials the wrong way — not …
Word on the national security street is that General James Mattis is being given the bum’s rush out of his job as commander of Central Command, and is being told to vacate his office several months earlier than planned.
Why the hurry? Pentagon insiders say that he rubbed civilian officials the wrong way — not because he went all “mad dog,” which is his public image, and the view at the White House, but rather because he pushed the civilians so hard on considering the second- and third-order consequences of military action against Iran. Some of those questions apparently were uncomfortable. Like, what do you do with Iran once the nuclear issue is resolved and it remains a foe? What do you do if Iran then develops conventional capabilities that could make it hazardous for U.S. Navy ships to operate in the Persian Gulf? He kept saying, “And then what?”
Inquiry along these lines apparently was not welcomed — at least in the CENTCOM view. The White House view, apparently, is that Mattis was too hawkish, which is not something I believe, having seen him in the field over the years. I’d call him a tough-minded realist, someone who’d rather have tea with you than shoot you, but is happy to end the conversation either way.
Presidents should feel free to boot generals anytime they want, of course — that’s our system, and one I applaud. But ousting Mattis at this time, and in this way, seems wrong for several reasons:
TIMING: If Mattis leaves in March, as now appears likely, that means there will be a new person running CENTCOM just as the confrontation season with Iran begins to heat up again.
CIVIL-MILITARY SIGNALS: The message the Obama Administration is sending, intentionally or not, is that it doesn’t like tough, smart, skeptical generals who speak candidly to their civilian superiors. In fact, that is exactly what it (and every administration) should want. Had we had more back in 2003, we might not have made the colossal mistake of invading Iraq.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/01/18/the-obama-administrations-inexplicable-mishandling-of-marine-gen-james-mattis-2/
Asked too many real world questions about the bullshit Iran deal, apparently.