Baker.
>>10618844 rt >>10618838 ——————————————— near zero results?
>Not a shill. Not blind.
>I agree a bunch of deep staters were fired. But if KC the only DS criminal to see a charge before election then WTF! Way past the 60 day mark now. What happened to results last spring. Gee COVID awefully convienent excuse for NEAR ZERO RESULTS!!!!
>BTW why is Q responding to my valid points with misdirection. I was clearly talking about indictments. Called me a shill. I was an awake patriot before you showed up.
>Now that I got Qs attention with my near zero results post (i know ur reading this)…
>Has anyone independently verified the Pacer data on these 180k-whatever was unsealed indictments?
>KC the only one? Was that even sealed?
>Tough questions dont make me a shill. But the fact you called me one in the face of said qs is an honor.
no you dont. check my qs
Wot?
M M M mmmm.