Anonymous ID: 848d3c April 16, 2018, 12:31 a.m. No.1062361   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2368

>>1062351

It's a pretty common name nah? But in this exact context, Nope. The creator of that doc got the name and the dept wrong.

Also, check the source. Your News Wire. ???

Anonymous ID: 848d3c April 16, 2018, 12:36 a.m. No.1062382   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1062368

Whatever. GCHQ wouldn't have been working with MI5 over a US General Election. They would've been working with MI6.

Christopher Steele is ex MI6.

 

Michael Steele and working with MI5 says it's fake.

Anonymous ID: 848d3c April 16, 2018, 1:22 a.m. No.1062526   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2529 >>2531 >>2610

>>1062515

They used the wrong name and they used the wrong dept.

Why would GCHQ work with MI5 on a US Generaly election? They would've been working with MI6.

That doc is fake af.

 

Maybe the content of the doc is true but the doc is fake and disinfo to steer people down an empty rabbit hole.

 

It the doc was true they would've said CHRISTOPHER Steele and MI6.

 

People who still believe it's legit only want to believe rather than using common sense and sticking with facts.

Anonymous ID: 848d3c April 16, 2018, 1:28 a.m. No.1062551   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1062529

Yes, it's fake just enough for people to miss the deliberate errors.

I'm not suggesting the content is fake cuz that's what probably happened but the actual doc is fake.

Anonymous ID: 848d3c April 16, 2018, 1:48 a.m. No.1062623   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2630

>>1062608

Idk. It's hard to do forensics on a document that's been passed around the interwebz cuz each new copy is destructive. This is why I never look for digital faults, unless of course it's the original document.

Otherwise it's too hard to tell.

Anonymous ID: 848d3c April 16, 2018, 1:53 a.m. No.1062643   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2655

>>1062610

Dude I'm not saying the content is fake cuz it probably happened but that actual doc is fake.

BTW, getting a name and an intel dept wrong is more than a typo. It's deliberate disinfo.

 

The real question is why would they put it out there and what are they really hiding?

 

Remember, Guccifer 2 is a DNC construct to try n discredit the real Wikileaks drop. I'm saying this is the same scenario.

Anonymous ID: 848d3c April 16, 2018, 1:57 a.m. No.1062651   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1062630

Could be for sure and tampered with just enough to change the names and the intel Dept.

 

I believe it's very clever disinfo, 80% true and 20% false.

Anonymous ID: 848d3c April 16, 2018, 2:05 a.m. No.1062680   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1062655

Dunno but I'm betting it was put out there to cover up for a real doc that's floating around.

Also odd is how the supposed author of that doc suddenly resigned 3 days after Trump was inaugurated.

Anonymous ID: 848d3c April 16, 2018, 2:18 a.m. No.1062744   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2764

>>1062723

kek, yea and I've been trying to fight off their disinfo for hours. Actually I'm still wondering if it's disinfo or people wanting to believe that doc is real and arguing with me.