It’s crazy because in a way you’re both kind of right, or maybe not really wrong, and most importantly well-reasoned; however I’m just kind of floating in the middle thinkng I really don't have enough HARD (and I mean really fucking hard) info to really go all-in in either direction.
Hi, I’m just trying to follow along here. What exactly makes that poster “beyond all hope”? If you don’t trust government, it would appear to be reasonable to me to not trust BHO is who he says he is. So I don’t see here how you have made the counter-case— that he should trust in goverment. You have probably confirmed the opposite.
I believe the point of the poster was essentially “how thorough were they with someone they don’t really care about when they weren’t thorough with someone they should have cared about A LOT (Obama)”.
My issue is: your hysterics have in no way addressed or even acknowledged his central point, and I don’t think his central point was too difficult to discern. So, speaking for myself, I feel you are not necessarily in pursuit of objective truth.
Ok, this seems reasonable. The missng item for me would be a solid theory of apples/oranges and why in the end it’s not just all fruit as the OP was insinuating.
Don’t worry, I already know you are not invested in my opinions. If you could bear it, though, please catch me up, I may have missed something— how is the “Steele” doc fake? It certainly exists and was used in FISA court?
Do you mean “untruthful”? Or do you mean “Steele” doesnkt exist?
>>106278
>Unless
>Receiving while off?
Strap your seatbelts faggots (better than Hastings did)