>>10634296

TY Baker!!!

Any anons want to opine or theorize as to the potential law enforcement advantages that a supermajority in the House and Senate will give us? How about the reddest wave ever seen in local/state politics at the same time? The reason I ask is this:

https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1305226390854279168

@RealJamesWoods

Here’s the reaction of an eyewitness to the ambush of two Deputies shot in the head in #Compton. The victims are in the background. No one is going to help them. Vote like your life depends on it. #BlueLivesMatter

Voting red at the booth, at least for this anon, will be status quo. It's going to be that way 20 years from now, too. But what does voting all red in every election possible do to "solve" this problem as Sir James seems to imply it will?

Genuine question.

>>10634418

>>10634426

Essentially, yes. They are using the same tactics here as they use in other places; so yes.

>>10634407

Q wants us to be be on the lookout, and report to authorities so they can address. See something, say something. Don't pull a Rittenhouse and get locked up.

If you are showing us this in order to inform us, is there a response being crafted to put an end to it? Asking for a friend.

>>10634858

You cannot control wildfires so easily, anon. It's one of the very few things I do NOT miss about Colorado. So, again, I get that patriots are in control, but innocents are dying, and losing homes/livelihoods for this "silent war" thing. The question stands:

Is there a response being organized to address these acts of terrorism?

>>10634716

TY for your service, anon. My step-dad was there, too.