Anonymous ID: 56d471 Sept. 14, 2020, 12:40 p.m. No.10646722   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6735 >>6832 >>6915

Anons, we're still far from 94% awake.

We could be looking at a Trump loss (which is part of the Plan) as it will take more people closer to the brink of enslavement so they rise up.

 

Im prepared for it to go either way, bc I can see a rise up if he wins…they way we are doing now…or a rise up if the fraud is so bad it causes him to lose.

Anonymous ID: 56d471 Sept. 14, 2020, 1:19 p.m. No.10647124   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7192

Youtube Censorship ALGORITHM tweaking:

 

Newest Harvard Research study asks survey takers to classify the political leanings of a youtube viewer/user account by analyzing their comments on youtube videos.

 

Each person you analyze is an actual user, and there is a link that takes you to their youtube profile so you can further judge.

 

No, Im not kidding.

 

The study:

https://harvard.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_0q9PB80eLy2Wko5

Anonymous ID: 56d471 Sept. 14, 2020, 1:45 p.m. No.10647373   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7412

>>10646832

Not that hard, anon. You can do this yourself. You are not dumb.

look at all the people you know personally. assess them on awake or not awake.

Take the percentage.

Extrapolate that to 300 million Americans (not accounting for children, and rounding up makes it easier)

I would guess it is close to 50%.

What do you come up with for yours?

Anonymous ID: 56d471 Sept. 14, 2020, 1:53 p.m. No.10647432   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7448 >>7457 >>7463

>>10647412

Now we have even more information.

My circle is at 50%

Your circle is at 70%

 

that averages to 60%

We are still quite a ways from 94%

 

Math works, try to drop the feels. feels never help. You think Q team isn't using the very same technique except on a larger scale?