>>10648291

>If Q was allowed to tell us what he hopes anons will do, he would? Maybe.

>Whatever it is, can we assume Q is not allowed to say?

>Does this help us figure out what it might be?

Sorry. If you are implying that Q wants us to engage in armed conflict with the left on American streets, then it’s gonna have to bea pretty fucking explicit statement

If I have to risk my life, it ain’t gonna be on something that I had a hunch on. No reading between the lines for something that serious.

>>10648362

>Good thing you weren’t around when they were fighting the British FAGGOT. Because they were all GUARANTEED freedom before fighting then right?

Even better that you weren’t around then. You’d have run off at the gun for every implied directive you got. You’d be a waste of a uniform.

You tried, riot shill.

>>10648425

You’re very emotional tonight. Take a break and spend some time with your wife and kids.

>>10648459

>Domestic terrorism.

POTUS needs to make it official rhen