Anonymous ID: decfd6 Sept. 14, 2020, 6:03 p.m. No.10650225   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0241

>>10650187

The anon posted a solution that is free (Wireshark and Glasswire) and the Anon posted an article explaining how someone could infect a meme with a canary token and asked other anons to read it.

 

DON'T FUCKING READ IT IF YOU DON'T WANT TO

 

I prefer to educate myself. Not like Q didn't say knowledge is power yesterday or anything.

Anonymous ID: decfd6 Sept. 14, 2020, 6:20 p.m. No.10650321   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10650288

> old news no one cares.

 

  1. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

Anonymous ID: decfd6 Sept. 14, 2020, 6:31 p.m. No.10650435   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10650399

>3) Shills are trying to impugn the integrity of the board and scare newfags away.

Quite the opposite, I'm trying to warn anons of the risk that canary tokens bring and offer a solution. Use it or don't that's on you.