Anonymous ID: ed9fb1 Sept. 14, 2020, 8:42 p.m. No.10652521   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10652319

His books are very good. Thatโ€™s what made me pay attention when he became a talking head on the alt news scene. But the more I observed and listened, the more sketchy he seemed. Iโ€™m not at all sure I know what his game is, unless (like Shipp) itโ€™s to mix up truth with falsehood and so hold inquisitive types in suspension.

Anonymous ID: ed9fb1 Sept. 14, 2020, 9:09 p.m. No.10652847   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2876 >>2886 >>2889

>>10652373

And the timeline sequence is exactly as you outline.

 

Exfiltration of emails - late May 2016

 

Guccifer 2.0 begins controlled leak - mid June 2016

 

Seth Rich 187 - July 10, 2016

 

Wikileaks first dump - July 22, 2016

 

The question about SR187 is why? Why run such a risk, when there were other ways of preventing future leaks? Did they fear SR has obtained more damning documents than was the case? Was it a message to Assange to try to halt publication of the emails? Did they know what had been exfiltrated? Who discovered the exfiltration and how? Was DWS behind the hit?