What Binney needs to explain is how the USB transfer speed signature isn't comparable with the official story.
DNC Server copied locally to SR's USB drive > Handoff to Wikileaks in a DC park
DNC Server to Ivan the Russian Hacker's computer at whatever speed > copied locally to USB drive → snailmail to Wikileaks
In both of these scenarios the USB copying-speed signature in the file timestamps is generated.
oops, screw up formatting.
>he has explained it
I've heard him rehash the timestamp transfer-speed explanation a dozen times. But I've never heard him explain how he's sure it was SR copying the files locally and not Mystery Hacker downloading them and then copying the files locally.
>he doesn't claim to be sure it was SR…Okay.
But the problem still remains that if we try to broach this to the general public as Evidence that contradicts the official narrative people will promptly point out that the same pattern is generated whether the files copied directly off the server to a USB drive or indirectly through a different computer to a USB drive, which is compatible with the official narrative. As it stands, it means nothing.
Minor annoyance for archivers. But nothing we haven't faced before.