make a simple program that does this algorithmically, but generate the random pattern uniquely.
the enemy will initially try to recognize your overlay and apply that to suspect images.
generating a unique random overlay for each image disables their ability to do this.
GREAT FIND.
Baker:
NOT A BULL
>The beauty of this is, you can make a bunch of filters with different patterns, different camo colors and i'd expect this to be very difficult to have anyway of capturing.
Randomizing this for every image is trivial with a simple program. My recommendation is to not use a paint program - randomize it with a program that just does it to an image (original -coded). I'm not in a situation where I could do it, but any self-respecting developer can pop this out pretty quickly. Someone will do it.
Well done!
Baker:
NOTABLE!!
This is why people with skills will own the future.
anon, if I were in a situation where I could have done this, I would have. You've responded faster than I would have.
Damn, youse gotz dum skillz.
keks in urgency?
>digital camo for digital soldiers
it is possible this is what Q was referring to when he mentioned learn how to use camouflage.
keks in obesity
dayum you dum too.
>Did DJT and the military who supposedly backed his presidency know this all would happen?
yes.
>Sorry to concernfag like a motherfucker but I'm lowkey freaking out.
relax. the cabal operates in a certain, hidden way. Q has revealed tot he masses how much/most/all? of how that works. if there is to be a hidden ruling class after this, it will be, at most, massively reduced in potential.
I'm watching for the rule of law, especially as applies to intellectual property. If you cannot trust the courts, we are lost.
Besides, if the cabal is now so powerful that Q is just a side show, then we were already fucked before any of this began.
Might as well relax, hope for the best and do everything you can to educate those around you about how the criminality works. This will help disarm it moving forward.
I hope you have another job to jump to.
This assumes, of course, that you aren't already targeted for a nice, comfy prison cell.
I'm a career imagefag, so I'll add some more ideas.
Varying the opacity of each cell is one enhancement.
Varying the shape of the cells is another one (although the complexity can easily skyrocket if you don't have the software to do this well. Most don't.)
Varying the method of combination is another method. Photoshop supports 20 different combination methods and most of those could be used.
Using these methods, a human would still be able to easily ascertain the intent and content of the image but it would take a VERY sophisticated and well trained AI to do it. (Hint: Even with all the hype you've heard about how awesome AI is mostly by fuckwit shills here spreading misinformation the tech to do that just isn't there yet.)
One clarification:
Blurred edges between cells would be another enhancement. Once again, if you don't have the imaging tools to do this, it gets complicated and/or time consuming.
>(a) a limited understanding of technical side of graphics production
my best recommendation is for anons to produce scripts that are easily portable (python, for example original anon used python for his script ) and then encourage other webfag anons to host imaging tools that will allow a user to upload an image and then apply filter(s) to it and serve the modified image to the user.
this way any user with zero experience can obfuscate any image with a few clicks.
>I'll try to do that
o7
I hope my comments helped. I've been terrified that Q is a sideshow since November of 2017. I still don't have any evidence of this, for what that's worth. (And I've been looking for that as the single highest priority. I've likely spent >8000 hours on this.)
warning from me, an imagefag.
As the resolution of the overlay decreases and/or gets more granular, it likely becomes easier for the filters to recognize the image. The overlays have to be chunky enough for the filters to see the overlay features as 'structure' in the image. (Your overlay image is much more granular than the original 'digital camo' image used above.)
>you're an idiot, and situationally unaware, to think that someone saying that porn is bad in a venue like this is going to prison.
unless, of course, you're a shill.
we should all start sending customer support feedback to Twitter asking them to add this as a feature.
tee hee
shit.
this is why Flynn posted this graphic.
he was telling us how to camouflage images.
flynn, you beast.
>Also considered a website to be the ultimate goal, but non predictable random generating image serving would be ripe for abuse.
This is true unless there are thousands of websites that do this popping up all over the place.
They can't DDoS a sufficient number of sites.
>Sorry. I'm dumb
No, this just means you're not a coderfag or webfag. Nothing says this stuff has to be in your wheelhouse.
we agree completely.
with a relatively small amount of work, you can change the random overlay over time to make it more complex for a filter to interpret (but a human won't care.)
For each <nframes, make a random overlay. Then for each frame in between, composite the previous and next overlay images with a smoothly transitioning transparency/opacity amount.
This will cause the result to have a smoothly changing random cell pattern to be constantly fading during the playback. The human brain will ignore it – it'll 'learn' almost instantly to ignore it.
But a filter…a filter will be all fucked up in ways we cannot imagine.
This is fun!
>How about about applying to keyframes only?
That probably won't help as the filters are most likely operating on the decoded stream and have no knowledge of the I-frames. Unless the filters are only using I-frames, in which case they're weak in other ways.
Could work, could not work. One would have to test it and see which methods work best.
>If the human mind believes everything is possible until proven it isn't, we reverse the entire illusion instilled on us that is keeping us stuck in old technology.
I'll go one step further in pointing out that the way to figure out what the cabal has been hiding for A LONG TIME is to figure them out yourself.
With a little fiddling and common sense, you'd be amazed what technologies you can figure out. You can figure out how the universities teach things wrong without even realizing it. You can figure out how the universe actually works.
Based on just what I've been able to figure out (which is quite a fucking lot), I anticipate that as soon as the cabal is clearly done for, there's going to be an explosion of new technologies that will make your head spin.
>Politically, what are the upsides and downsides?
Politically it would be suicidal for the Democrats. It would prove that Obama hid something that would compromise him from a security standpoing (potential blackmail.) It would prove Democrats are deceivers. Instant loss of election.
>there is holes in foundational theory which thus constrains people to that way of thinking, almost everything has been solved and a long time ago.
Bingo. Sounds like you've found some of the same things I have.
People don't understand that an overwhelmingly common side-effect of professional education is the student believing too much of what they're taught and assuming smarter people than they have already determined there's no way to do things.
Have you figured out the reason the first and second laws of thermodynamics are worded the way they are? :)