Anonymous ID: bfc979 Sept. 15, 2020, 12:05 p.m. No.10658477   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8644 >>8651 >>9037

>>10658384

there are colder and warmer periods in earth history. what are wrong are over-hyped predictions, not the possibility that we could be entering a cold period.

I don't personally know. but I do know that that "science" doesn't know either

science is highly political now, but it has always been difficult for scientists to let go of pet theories, especially ones that are widely believed, because their careers suffer. there is a book about this that says basically the oldies who are wedded to the current paradigm have to die off before progress is made

the danger today is that there is so much money involved, and enough power to do really stupid things to supposedly save the world. sick of the megalomanics running things. they don't really know, but insist they do

Anonymous ID: bfc979 Sept. 15, 2020, 12:27 p.m. No.10658713   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9002

>>10658644

this is exactly why replication is the gold standard of science

someone else doing your experiment should get the same results

in "science" that depends on models, prediction is what makes it true or false. your model is a best guess, and dependent on your inputs. If your model doesn't predict reality, it is crap

that's why climate science is crap. it's models that have been wrong time and again. confirmation bias is when you have the answer and look only at the facts that support it. that is not science, period. but a lot of people seem not to know that

Anonymous ID: bfc979 Sept. 15, 2020, 12:33 p.m. No.10658772   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10658739

it's even stupider than that. they don't want to end anything, nor do they care. if they did, they'd be out in the ghetto every weekend doing shit to actually help the brothers and sisters. no, they just want to virtue signal. seeming good is good enough