Here's another thought: WHAT IF the document is ABSOLUTELY GENUINE, and we are being shown another example of the extent to which:
a) they were presenting fabricated lies to ensure the authorization and purposely substituted MICHAEL for CHRISTOPHER (adding another layer in case anyone actually did some research before the approval) and/or
b) the whole process was SLOPPY (i.e. can't even get the first name right)
NONE OF THESE ^^^^^^ potential scenarios would INVALIDATE the document in terms of the overall goal!!!!!!