Australian police accessed Chinese diplomats' emails and messages as part of foreign political interference investigation

Australian police accessed the communications of top Chinese diplomats and named a Chinese consular official in a warrant as part of an investigation into political interference, in the months before a crackdown on Australians in China.

Key points:

Correspondence between Chinese diplomats and a policy adviser to NSW Labor MP Shaoquett Moselmane has been seized by Australian police

The seizures were made as part of an investigation into an alleged plot to infiltrate the NSW Labor Party

The Consulate-General in Sydney says the accusations are "nothing but vicious slanders"

The ABC has uncovered explosive details of the highly sensitive investigation that has privately infuriated the Chinese Government in recent months as the Australia-China relationship has deteriorated into its worst crisis since the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.

Search warrants seen by the ABC reveal the Australian Federal Police (AFP) are investigating whether China's Sydney consulate conspired with a New South Wales MP's policy adviser, John Zhisen Zhang, in a plot to infiltrate the Labor Party and influence voters.

The warrants identify Sydney Consul Sun Yantao, who is responsible for managing relations with the Chinese diaspora and pro-Beijing organisations.

Mr Sun was appointed to the Sydney consulate by the Overseas Chinese Affairs Office, which has been taken over by China's foreign influence agency, the United Front Work Department (UFWD).

In a statement, the Consulate-General in Sydney said accusations it "engaged in infiltration activities are totally baseless and nothing but vicious slanders".

"The Chinese Consulate-General in Sydney is committed to promoting friendly exchanges and pragmatic cooperation in various fields between the Chinese side and New South Wales," the statement said.

"It always observes international law and basic norms of international relations while exercising duties in Australia."

Australia accused of breaching sacred international treaties

More

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-15/australian-police-accessed-chinese-diplomat-communications/12665724

Mask-Enforcing Humanoid Robots Set To Invade Office Spaces

As some Wall Street banks have summoned traders and other employees back to offices, their ability to enforce social distancing measures will be challenging unless human-like mask-detecting robots are deployed.

Pepper, designed by SoftBank Robotics, is the world's first social humanoid robot able to recognize faces and basic human emotions. The robot stands 120 cm (47 inches) uses optical sensors and artificial intelligence to recognize if people are wearing masks.

With JPMorgan and other Wall Street banks requesting employees to return back to the office, where some of these folks spent the summer partying in the Hamptons without masks, it's going to be difficult to enforce mask-wearing, unless policing robots are deployed.

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/mask-enforcing-humanoid-robots-could-invade-office-spaces

Ingraham: Billionaires and Bolsheviks for Biden

VICTORIA IS FARKET UP #StayHome

People fleeing Melbourne to be fined $5,000

Sky News Australia

Victoria Police will fine people $5,000 if they are caught trying to leave Melbourne for the regions.

>>10663951

What happens when it rains and all the fires refuge and that toxic pink shit they drop everywhere runs into the water?

Watch the water

>>10663990

No.

What are the Punishments for Transgressing the 7 Noahide Laws?

From Melachim uMilchamot – Chapter 9:14:

A gentile who transgresses these seven commands shall be executed by decapitation. For this reason, all the inhabitants of Shechem were obligated to die.Shechem kidnapped. They observed and were aware of his deeds, but did not judge him.

A gentile is executed on the basis of the testimony of one witness and the verdict of a single judge.No warning is required. Relatives may serve as witnesses. However, a woman may not serve as a witness or a judge for them.

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188354/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-9.htm

From Melachim uMilchamot – Chapter 9:2:

A gentile who worships false gods is liable provided he worships them in an accepted manner.

A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment. However, a gentile is not executed for a type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would not deem worthy of capital punishment. Nevertheless, even though a gentile will not be executed for these forms of worship, he is forbidden to engage in all of them.

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188354/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-9.htm

From Wikipedia:

The Talmud lists the punishment for blaspheming the Ineffable Name of God as death. The sons of Noah are to be executed by decapitation for most crimes,[25] considered one of the lightest capital punishments,[26] by stoning if he has intercourse with a Jewish betrothed woman,[27] or by strangulation if the Jewish woman has completed the marriage ceremonies, but had not yet consummated the marriage.[27]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

From the Talmud:

רב הונא ורב יהודה וכולהו תלמידי דרב אמרי על שבע מצות בן נח נהרג גלי רחמנא בחדא והוא הדין לכולהו

Rav Huna, Rav Yehuda, and all of the other students of Rav say: A descendant of Noah is executed for transgressing any of the seven Noahide mitzvot; the Merciful One revealed this punishment with regard to one mitzva, the prohibition of bloodshed, and the same is true with regard to all of them.

Punishment

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.57a.13?lang=bi

From Noahide.org:

Prospectives on Noahide Laws Chapter 5:

The Noahide laws are generally held to be so evident and normal that one cannot plead ignorance or lack of warning to be exempt from liability for their non-observance[40]. The theoretical punishment of the Torah for transgression of the Noahide laws is death, although such a penalty could only be enforced at a time when the great Sanhedrin, the Jewish High Court, convened in its place on the Temple Mount[41], and it seems that even when that was the case, this penalty was almost never carried out. The significance of the theoretical death penalty in general, whether for Jew or non-Jew, is given in the words of Rashi, namely that “one has transgressed the will of one’s Creator”[42]. In the case of the Noahide laws, it is that the very purpose for which a human was created, namely to settle the world peacefully has been contradicted and, and so also the essential point of the human being’s existence has been vitiated[43].

https://noahidelaw.com/punishment-for-transgressing-the-noahide-laws/

The Future Is Bright

Brilliantly done

>>10664203

They need our blood

God put in man a certain genealogical power to cause the marrow of the bones to generate blood for the

life of flesh (Lev. 17:11). Jewry lacks that power. He steals it from man, however, in mongrelization.

The Satanic dyed vampire is manifest in what we have believed was Jewry's white blood corpuscles. In

man, they are round, yet shaped differently for each race. That is one reason God established the Divine

Law for the various races not to mongrelize, In Jewry,however, the "white blood" corpuscles are long

and stringy, and Divine Law forbids all humanity to mongrelize with the Devil's Serpent race, because

the children will in turn be vampire and totally cut off from God.

In times past the Serpent race absorbed entire nations in order to renew the life force in their bone

marrow. Ezek. 28: 12-19 and Isa. 49:26 show the vampire condition. The latter states: "AndI (God) will

feed them that oppress thee (Israel) with their own flesh; and they shall be drunken with their own

blood as with sweet wine: and all flesh shall know that I am the Lord and thy Savior and thy Redeemer

the Mighty One of Jacob".

Benghazi: The Forgotten "September 11th" Attack On The US Consulate In Libya

If you say “September 11” most people automatically think of the attacks on the World Trade Center buildings and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. What they probably don’t even remember happened on September 11, were the attacks on the United States Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012.

Once the Libyan Revolution began in February 2011, the CIA began placing assets in the region, attempting to make contacts within the region. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, whose name and image would soon become synonymous with the Benghazi attacks, was the first liaison between the United States and the rebels. The task before the American intelligence community at that time was securing arms in the country, most notably shoulder-fired missiles, taken from the Libyan military.

Eastern Libya and Benghazi were the primary focal points of intelligence-gathering in the country. But there was something else at work here: The CIA was using the country as a base to funnel weapons to anti-Assad forces in Syria, as well as their alleged diplomatic mission.

Early Rumblings of Disorder in Benghazi

Trouble started in April 2012. This was when two former security guards of the consulate threw an IED over the fence. No casualties were reported, but another bomb was thrown at a convoy just four days later. Soon after, in May, the office of the International Red Cross in Benghazi was attacked and the local al-Qaeda affiliate claimed responsibility. On August 6, the Red Cross suspended operations in Libya.

This was all part of a troubling escalation of violence in the region. The British Ambassador Dominic Asquith was the victim of an assassination attempt on June 10, 2012. As a result of this and of rocket attacks on convoys, the British withdrew their entire consular staff from Libya in late June of that year.

American military and consular personnel on the scene were increasingly troubled by the situation and communicated their concerns to top brass through official channels. Two security guards in the consulate noticed a Libyan police officer (or at least someone dressed as one) taking pictures of the building, which raised alarms. Indeed, consular officials had been requesting additional security as far back as March.

On June 6, 2012, a large hole was blown in the wall of the consulate gate. It was estimated that 40 men could go through the hole in the wall. In July, the State Department informed officials on the ground that the existing security contract would not be renewed. On August 2, Ambassador Stephens requested additional security detail. The State Department responded by completely removing his security detail three days later. Three days after this, his security detail had left Libya entirely. On August 16, the regional security officer warned then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the security situation in Libya was “dire.”

The Day of the Attack on Benghazi: The Cover-Up Begins

The September 11, 2012 attack was actually two attacks by two separate militias. The first was the attack on the diplomatic mission, the second was a mortar attack on the CIA annex. But the attacks themselves were effectively watched in real time by the White House, thanks to security drones in the region. By 5:10pm ET, President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta were watching real-time footage via a drone deployed to the area.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/benghazi-forgotten-september-11th-attack-us-consulate-libya