Multi domain battlefield.

Multi-domain battle, a joint combined arms concept for the 21st century includes capabilities of the physical domains and places greater emphasis on space, cyberspace as well as other contested areas such as the electromagnetic spectrum, the information environment and the cognitive dimension of warfare.

https://www.army.mil/standto/archive/2017/03/08/index.html

The army envisioned it for 2025-2050, but it’s here, now.

Invisible Warfare

Not all fire and maneuver is physical, however, Brown emphasized. In fact, the “heart” of the Multi-Domain Task Force is the recently created (and cumbersomely named) battalion for Intelligence, Information, Cyber, Electronic Warfare, & Space — I2CEWS, pronounced

eye two Qs.”

“Information ops is absolutely critical, [but] we didn’t originally have it in the ICEWS formation,” Brown said. “That was added [because] you’ve got to get it in there.”

https://breakingdefense.com/2019/04/armys-multi-domain-unit-a-game-changer-in-future-war/

Then you have a snake in the midst-

https://www.army.mil/article/184551/

>General Brown

To achieve integration requires a new approach, a new mindset.

All U.S. forces must change their distinct service cultures to a culture of inclusion and openness, focusing on a "purple (or joint) first" mentality.

The military did not, does not have this problem. Decades of war has removed the perceived separation they described could be solved with “inclusiveness”. Their plan for this would be allowing transgendered people to serve, and women in typically male professions. The truth is not sexist, i’ve seen first hand the battle readiness of a previously all male unit decline sharply when genders are mixed. There are a multitude of complications that come with it. Feminists disagree with it, call it sexist. It’s not, it’s just the hard truth. A woman (typically) cannot haul the same amount of weight, nor goes as long in the carrying as a male (typically). They are prone to hip fractures and other injuries that a male soldier does not have a tendency to be afflicted with. This doesn’t even get into the nature of male and female relationships that do occur, the friction it creates in a team. That is just the hard nature of life that these people ignore in the name of “equality”. Their version of “equality” is more valued than winning a war.

The Army must further integrate a mission command mindset, where every person is empowered to gain the initiative based on his or her role and function.

This is wong. Flat out wrong. The military works because it is understood that if a higher up gives an order, it is to be carried out. Questioning orders or requiring an explanation does not serve in wartime. Did the men who took the beach in Normandy understand their role going into what seemed certain death or were they told to take the beach at all costs? A private should have no ability to say no when given an order unless it is illegal, immoral, or unethical otherwise the chain of command ceases to have a purpose.

And it must focus on developing leaders who thrive in ambiguity and chaos.

Leaders should be able to function in ambiguity and chaos. By bringing order to it. Not by thriving in it. This idea just focuses on creating a need and desire for chaos and ambiguity and is absolutely insane.