Thanks, baker.
There we have it.
"It is a CRIMINAL OFFENSE to INTENTIONALLY…engage in electronic surveillance under color of law except authorized by "identified statutory provisions, or…"
"The government acknowledges that there were material omissions, and the Court has found VIOLATIONS of the government's duty of candor, in ALL FOUR APPLICATIONS."
Steven Aftergood, who tracks government secrecy for the Federation of American Scientists, said he was not prepared to call the LifeLog initiative illegitimate. But, you know, it's one more program that demands vigilant oversight, he said. The more personal experience that can be captured by digital means, the more vulnerable that experience is to unwanted surveillance.
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/30/us/pentagon-explores-a-new-frontier-in-the-world-of-virtual-intelligence.html?src=pm&gwh=C39232292790FE3ED00B94B118A98CA1&gwt=pay
indeed. class action lawsuits are effective anon heard once.