https:// www.themarketswork.com/2018/03/11/victor-pinchuk-the-clintons-endless-connections/
Here is the connections to Clintons spelled out for normies!!!
Hannity as client, seems to be a setup. MSM will not come to his defense, so that will open the door when they start to arrest and seize MSM reporters files and their attorney's files.
This smells like Counterintelligence Op!
Hannity, never paid him but asked legal questions where he assumed AC privilege and never where third party was involved. He has 8 other attorneys. This is a classic setup !!!
Doesn't matter if paid or not, even an initial consultation (paid or not) is protected under ACP!
Theory:
RR's our guy
RM's our guy
This is a look over there, look over there and the HAMMER comes down with those two yielding it against Clinton Inc. In corruption of Clinton's with Ukraine and dossier. SOON?
Correct, only an expectation is needed and Hannity just said on air he had such an expectation and no third parties involved. So guess what, no quick taint team access. Judge to look at warrant and decide. Smells of a look here, look here, oops BOOM over there.
Wrong ACP applies on client expectation, no money necessary. Otherwise, you approach a lawyer he doesn't take case and he could use it against you. Expand your thinking!
It could mean they want to bring attention to the exceptions to it. Because they law firms used to funnel dossier money do not get protection under fraud exception or acting within a business transaction instead of lawyer client. Basically, you can't get a lawyer to do something in a transaction that you yourself would not get ACP to avoid having to disclose it. Just a thought on what is going to come down when they have all these attorneys with conflicts running around doing funding and transactions on behalf of Hillary and DNC, et al.
Incorrect, expectation of privacy is enough. Now intercepted and publication of email may come out in public, but can't be used in proceeding unless certain exceptions made.
Then again if Holder is your boss, you think he might have told him, nice job. Now move along? Just saying, RR may be our guy after all.
Agreed, remember "They won't be able to walk the streets" they can drop anything they want and just can't use it to prosecute unless they can source it through another source. I was thinking Lorret Lynch RBG info. If it dropped, RBG doesn't need to be prosecuted, but it would force her to resign or face impeachment (political process doesn't need to follow rules of evidence). Thoughts?
80/20 not all
Agreed, but if they release video, regardless of use as evidence. These people will not be able to walk streets safely.
Keep an eye out for the Comey memo deadline to Congress tonight. TG already saying he saw them and would be Exhibit A in defense of Trump. So this is happening soon, me thinks!