Anonymous ID: e1ea1d Sept. 16, 2020, 5:40 p.m. No.10675414   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5460 >>5549

>>10675392

>1 post by this ID

It's called reeling them in and Congress doesn't have anything to do with this, it's all under the aegis of administrative law so that means that Congress can't do shit. It's a regulatory action which is initiated by the charters of the regulatory groups in play, in this case the FCC.

Anonymous ID: e1ea1d Sept. 16, 2020, 5:57 p.m. No.10675635   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5651 >>5654 >>5676 >>5678

>>10675606

I'm in the camp that says only the first couple crops of Q posts were authentic. The cuck chan's mods and jannies banned Q threads.

 

It's like FBI anon, the first couple posts were real and then after that it turned into a larp especially after the trip code change, and then later spawned meganon, purple anon, a bunch of larps if you ask me.

Anonymous ID: e1ea1d Sept. 16, 2020, 6:20 p.m. No.10675900   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10675549

They don't have to amend anything, it's all administrative. Since platforms are now editorial they are publishers, thus 230 is rightfully removed under the CDA. Congress delegated the authority of oversight to the FCC, Ajit's gonna rape Twitter and Faceberg and yes Tik Tokโ€ฆ