Actually, I think that idea has considerable merit. Choose Dems who are in closely contested races. We'll know the difference, but the Dems won't.
Well shit … post the whole alphabet.
Well shit … post the whole alphabet. >>10677484
Would love to see it uncut and unedited. Too many obvious cuts to be worth anything at the moment.
THIS is so the Dems can claim that Trump supporters are paid. It's to counter the high volume of spontaneous turnout.
There is no need to actually hire anyone. The intent is to have the ad to point to.
A couple days ago my ex-wife called looking for some paperwork (49 years!). In the course of the conversation, she said she's hated Trump for 20 years. Could not name a single thing he has done to hurt her or the country. Thinks Rittenhouse was wrong for defending himself and had no right to be in Kenosha. She's convinced that he went there in order to murder peaceful protestors.
We've been divorced since 1976 because she couldn't keep her knees together long enough for me to go to work. Divorcing her is one of the best decisions I've ever made. I got the kids, the sewing machine, the upright freezer and $20 per week child support. She skipped out on the child support, but I figure that bought me a certain amount of peace.