>>10677181 pb

>can any anon find an example of previous Q

posts that were unsigned?

I think this one below might have been Q, unsigned.

>>9321917

>9321906

>They write that "science experts say that … ", to get the public to believe their con job. Hate those bastards. Thieves.

Worse than thieves.

Murderers and traitors.

[KNOWINGLY]