Anonymous ID: 002004 Sept. 17, 2020, 8:14 a.m. No.10681192   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10681148

did I say you did that?

why would you think that.

how donk!

 

now I'm just being a jerk.

 

OK, fine.

but I think that there is a real 'reality' and that we don't just get what is given us by idiots who 'tell us like it is' but are lying to us.

 

so that's my point.

 

being a donk doesn't mean that you're bad. It just means tha tyou fuck with people's minds while you try to tell them the stuff you want them to hear, and it's a bit unfriendly.

 

being one who says that all the time is thus also donk.

 

we all need to dedonk, that is my point.

so we can be 'undonkulous'

Anonymous ID: 002004 Sept. 17, 2020, 8:21 a.m. No.10681247   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10681236

it was said of . . . tht he was sudden, but thurough.

even if it were . . . . the women were always . . . satiated.

quick and to the point.

sudden lightning, like a Q drop with mouse tails that look like . . . .

Anonymous ID: 002004 Sept. 17, 2020, 8:22 a.m. No.10681253   🗄️.is 🔗kun

and it was always said of the charming dashing man that he may have, at times, been sudden, but he was never premature.

Anonymous ID: 002004 Sept. 17, 2020, 8:33 a.m. No.10681346   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10681309

did n't someone post the fct that anon are not . . .

let me look at my archives so I can get it correct . . .

 

" 'core set of threat actors' "

 

just tell them this:

 

Anon are not a core set of threat actors. Each anon must be viewed as a single individual. There is no conspiracy, it's a grapphitti wall for politics.

 

repeat:

 

'anon are not a core set of treat actors'