the ironic and contridictory 'speaks as if' but really we know you're just an ironic donk.
when the text says 'love love love' but the image is devil horns: that's donk.
division is donk
did I say you did that?
why would you think that.
how donk!
now I'm just being a jerk.
OK, fine.
but I think that there is a real 'reality' and that we don't just get what is given us by idiots who 'tell us like it is' but are lying to us.
so that's my point.
being a donk doesn't mean that you're bad. It just means tha tyou fuck with people's minds while you try to tell them the stuff you want them to hear, and it's a bit unfriendly.
being one who says that all the time is thus also donk.
we all need to dedonk, that is my point.
so we can be 'undonkulous'
or make graphics for candidates you admire.
orwells irony isn't truth, it's ironic mocking of the left.
it was said of . . . tht he was sudden, but thurough.
even if it were . . . . the women were always . . . satiated.
quick and to the point.
sudden lightning, like a Q drop with mouse tails that look like . . . .
and it was always said of the charming dashing man that he may have, at times, been sudden, but he was never premature.
in context grammar matters. otherwise you're a badger and bitch to people.
knock it off, you're starting to tick people off!
did n't someone post the fct that anon are not . . .
let me look at my archives so I can get it correct . . .
" 'core set of threat actors' "
just tell them this:
Anon are not a core set of threat actors. Each anon must be viewed as a single individual. There is no conspiracy, it's a grapphitti wall for politics.
repeat:
'anon are not a core set of treat actors'