>>10681492 (pb)

>>10681759 (pb)

>Q's clock had red lines not in the original pic

>>10681764 (pb)

>not true.

In the most significant sense, the first claim is true.

Pictures of the clock with the red lines can be found online in promotional articles. As OP above found, Q's filename points here:

https://techcrunch.com/2019/12/18/heres-a-mickey-mouse-version-of-amazons-echo-wall-clock/

However, the Amazon FCC filing for the Echo device includes what is essentially the same pic, and it does NOT include the red lines.

https://fccid.io/UUU-8459

https://fccid.io/UUU-8459/External-Photos/External-photo-4526636.iframe

Obviously, Q expects that Anons will figure out where the pic comes from and what the device is, so Q EXPECTS that anons will recognize that there are two different versions of the pic out there. Q SPECIFICALLY chose to post the pic with the red lines.

(I wonder if the 8 is a marker for 8kun, but the deeper point is that it likely means SOMETHING.)

But I also think there are clues in the specific Techcrunch article identified by the filename.

The author is Brian HEATER. Morning sun brings HEAT?

Also check the article date: December 18, 2019.

Compare Q3721 (12/18/19), which mentions 'echo chamber'. The post is about the control of the media by a few corporations. Who owns the Washington Post?

Also compare Q370 (12/18/17), which says "Clock started". (Maybe someone can do something with the "10 days" - no definite idea on that right now.)