Anonymous ID: da5037 Sept. 18, 2020, 11:33 a.m. No.10695632   🗄️.is 🔗kun

House Democrats call on DOJ watchdog to open 'emergency investigation' into Durham inquiry

 

Top House Democrats called for Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz to investigate Attorney General William Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham for their investigation of the Trump-Russia investigators one day after Senate Democrats made the same request. “We write to ask that you open an emergency investigation into whether” Barr, Durham, and other Justice Department political appointees “are following DOJ’s longstanding policy to avoid taking official actions or other steps that could improperly influence the upcoming presidential election,” the Friday letter from the Democratic leaders said. “We also request that you evaluate the authority and scope under which” Durham “is operating” because Barr “has only provided vague and shifting statements about the purpose and scope of the investigation.” Barr recently denied that he is being pressured by President Trump in his handling of Durham’s inquiry and claimed that any actions taken won't affect the 2020 election. Barr has stressed that the Durham review will abide by Justice Department guidelines and has repeatedly said that despite urging from Trump, former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Joe Biden, who is now the 2020 Democratic presidential nominee, are not under criminal investigation.

 

The six-page Friday letter, signed by Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler of New York, Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff of California, Oversight Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney, and House Administration Chairwoman Zoe Lofgren, followed a Thursday letter led by Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris along with nine other Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee urging Horowitz to audit the investigation by Barr and Durham into the origins of the Trump-Russia inquiry and the conduct of law enforcement and intelligence officials during that investigation. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to the Washington Examiner's request for comment. The DOJ watchdog's office declined to comment. "House Democrats are absolutely terrified," the Twitter account for Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee tweeted in response to the letter. "They know Barr and Durham are cleaning up … what the Obama/Biden DOJ left behind. And the results won’t be pretty for them." House Democrats wrote that “we are concerned by indications” that Barr “might depart from longstanding DOJ principles to take public action” related to Durham’s investigation “that could impact the presidential election.” They also claimed that “Barr has signaled repeatedly that he is likely to allow DOJ to take prosecutorial actions, make public disclosures, and even issue reports before the presidential election in November” and that “such actions clearly appear intended to benefit President Trump politically.”

 

Three prior attorneys general — George W. Bush’s attorney general, Michael Mukasey, and Obama’s attorneys general Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch — released similar memos on conducting investigations related to political candidates close to an election. “Simply put, politics must play no role in the decisions of federal investigators or prosecutors regarding any investigations or criminal charges,” the Mukasey, Holder, and Lynch memos all stated. “Law enforcement officers and prosecutors may never select the timing of investigative steps or criminal charges for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party.” In February, Barr released his own memo.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house-democrats-call-on-doj-watchdog-to-open-emergency-investigation-into-durham-inquiry

Nadler Letter to Michael Horowitz

https://judiciary.house.gov/uploadedfiles/2020-09-18_ltr_to_doj_ig.pdf

Bill Barr Memo

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20200624/110836/HHRG-116-JU00-20200624-SD009-U19.pdf

Anonymous ID: da5037 Sept. 18, 2020, 11:51 a.m. No.10695780   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5860

Assange lawyer claims Trump associates offered pardon of WikiLeaks founder in exchange for source of emails leak

 

One of the lawyers representing WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said that allies of President Trump indicated he was interested in discussing a deal with Assange contingent on the release of key information relating to the 2016 election. During extradition hearings in London on Friday, Assange lawyer Jennifer Robinson said she recalled meeting with Trump associate Charles Johnson and then-GOP Rep. Dana Rohrabacher on Aug. 15, 2017, in the Ecuadorian Embassy to discuss a deal for Assange's freedom. “The proposal put forward by Congressman Rohrabacher was that Mr. Assange identify the source for the 2016 election publications in return for some kind of pardon, assurance, or agreement, which would both benefit President Trump politically and prevent U.S. indictment and extradition,” Robinson said. Assange had been in the embassy in London since August 2012, and Robinson said the pair offered a deal approved by Trump that would drop extradition charges if he was willing to reveal the source behind a bevy of Democratic Party emails that WikiLeaks published ahead of the 2016 election. “They stated that President Trump was aware of and had approved of them coming to meet with Mr. Assange to discuss a proposal and that they would have an audience with the president to discuss the matter on their return to Washington, D.C.,” Robinson said.

 

She suggested that the men were hopeful they could disprove that the Russian government was behind the email leak, which is the belief of the U.S. intelligence community. “Congressman Rohrabacher explained he wanted to resolve the ongoing speculation about Russian involvement in the Democratic National Committee leaks to WikiLeaks, which were published by WikiLeaks and other media organizations in 2016," Robinson said. "He stated that he regarded the ongoing speculation as damaging to U.S.-Russian relations, that it was reviving Cold War politics, and that it would be in the best interests of the U.S. if the matter could be resolved." In a statement released in February, Rohrabacher confirmed that he had met with Assange but denied conversing with Trump on the subject. The White House also denied the connection. "The president barely knows Dana Rohrabacher, other than he’s an ex-congressman. He’s never spoken to him on this subject or almost any subject. It is a complete fabrication and a total lie," then-White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/assange-lawyer-claims-trump-associates-offered-pardon-of-wikileaks-founder-in-exchange-for-source-of-emails-leak

Trump 'associates' offered Assange pardon in return for emails source, court hears

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/sep/18/trump-offered-julian-assange-pardon-in-return-for-democrat-hacking-source-court-told

Donald Trump 'offered WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange a win-win deal to avoid extradition to US if he revealed source of the hacking of Democratic party emails', court hears

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8747593/Donald-Trump-offered-Julian-Assange-win-win-deal-avoid-extradition-court-hears.html