Anonymous ID: 36eff0 Sept. 18, 2020, 5:26 p.m. No.10700089   🗄️.is 🔗kun

lb notable >>10699649

Amy Coney Barrett?

 

In his interview w @hughhewitt, POTUS says he has somebody in mind to fill a Supreme Court vacancy. He wouldn't say who, but we reported last year that during Kavanaugh deliberations POTUS said he was "saving" ACB for an RBG vacancy.

— Jonathan Swan (@jonathanvswan) August 11, 2020

 

Amy Coney Barrett (born 1972)[1][2] is a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Barrett is the first and only woman to occupy an Indiana seat on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Described as an "originalist" and a "textualist," Barrett's judicial philosophy has been likened to that of her late-mentor and former boss, Justice Antonin Scalia.[3] Prior to her confirmation to the federal bench, Barrett was a professor of law at Notre Dame Law School, where she taught civil procedure, constitutional law, and statutory interpretation.[2][4][5] Barrett's scholarship focuses on originalism, statutory interpretation, and stare decisis.[6] As a federal judge, Barrett continues to teach statutory interpretation at Notre Dame Law School.

 

Despite Barrett's strong conservative credentials, distinguished liberals have joined conservatives in their praise of Barrett's intellect.[7][8][9][10] Notably, Barrett's nomination to the Seventh Circuit was supported by every single one of the 34 law clerks, liberals and conservatives alike, who clerked on the Supreme Court during Barrett's clerkship term.[11] Shortly after her confirmation in 2017, Barrett was added to President Trump's list of potential Supreme Court nominees.[12] She is widely considered to be the frontrunner for the current Supreme Court vacancy created by Ginsburg's death.[13][14][15][16][17]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett

 

Judicial Winning: Amy Coney Barrett

Amy Coney Barrett, now a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, is well-known to conservatives. Many remember that during her confirmation, she endured an ugly episode of anti-Catholic bigotry at the hands of California senator Dianne Feinstein, who infamously said to the then-nominee: “The dogma lives loudly within you, and that’s of concern.”

 

Since taking the bench, Judge Barrett has been a champion of originalism.

 

In the 2019 case of Kanter v. Barr, Judge Barrett dissented from a panel opinion that turned away a nonviolent felon’s Second Amendment challenge to federal and state laws prohibiting him from owning a gun. The challenger argued that the laws — which ban all felons, violent and nonviolent, from gun possession — were too broad in that they swept in low-risk people like him (the man had been convicted of Medicare-related mail fraud).

 

The court sided instead with the government, holding that while the fit between the government objective of reducing violent crime and the group of people banned from obtaining guns was not perfect, it did not need to be a perfect fit. As the court held, “a reasonable fit” is all that was needed for the law to be constitutional — little solace for the individual dispossessed of his Second Amendment rights.

(continued)

https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/judicial-winning-amy-coney-barrett/

 

bringing the Republic Back:

Gorsuch and Barrett would agree with Potus to remove the DS Admin State whereby Congress over the years has effectively abdicated its law making power and accountability by forming Agencies to rule most aspect of commerce and regulation of the country, empowering these Agencies with 'rule, regulatory making power with force of law. That brought us to today with AMA, CDC, FCC, FDA, etc., etc. running the country for corporate and banking interests while Congress has relegated itself to being a club with their hands out for favors for themselves and their families and campaign contributors.

Potus has alluded to this scam many times and a good example is the CDC and FDA having moar loyalty to Big Pharma and Global Orgs like the WHO than to the American People, and the frustration is that they are insulated from scrutiny because the peoples vote cannot directly vote them out, and since they are sanctioned by Congress, separation of Powers limits Potus Exec power to intervene when they go rogue, as now with the CDC and Fauci.

Anonymous ID: 36eff0 Sept. 18, 2020, 5:28 p.m. No.10700143   🗄️.is 🔗kun

lb notables >>10699446 , >>10699447, >>10699499 POTUS: I'd been in DC 17 times. 17 times'

 

anon note:

Potus also highlighted he never stayed overnight.

Likely due to surveillance, eyes and ears of DS/MOS, etal.

Anonymous ID: 36eff0 Sept. 18, 2020, 5:31 p.m. No.10700238   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10700138

good time because Potus has some cards to play and even LG knows dems are dirty.

if LG tries to hold up conf., i think grassley will intervene, many in congress realize there was never any gentlemen/woman agreements that dems would ever honor, and that we are in a war for our republic.

Anonymous ID: 36eff0 Sept. 18, 2020, 5:50 p.m. No.10700600   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0619

>>10700237

religious make up of SC

 

Until RBG the court had 3 jews.

6 christians (gorsuch raised catholic but identifies as protestant.

 

From a power standpoint the catholic/christian is worthless as a stat. The voting power/ decision process is not along religious tenets with (all) christians.

 

SC voting is Liberal v Conservative.

 

Liberals:

*RBG

Kagan

Breyer

Sotomayor

 

Swing voters:

Roberts (leans conservative)

Gorsuch (leans heavy conservative)

 

Conservative:

Thomas

Alito

Kavanaugh

 

( a novice opinion here based upon my interpetations, but point is anyone BHO nominated that identifies as a catholic is not)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

Anonymous ID: 36eff0 Sept. 18, 2020, 5:50 p.m. No.10700603   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10700237

religious make up of SC

 

Until RBG the court had 3 jews.

6 christians (gorsuch raised catholic but identifies as protestant.

 

From a power standpoint the catholic/christian is worthless as a stat. The voting power/ decision process is not along religious tenets with (all) christians.

 

SC voting is Liberal v Conservative.

 

Liberals:

*RBG

Kagan

Breyer

Sotomayor

 

Swing voters:

Roberts

Gorsuch (leans heavt

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States>>10700237