>>10702931

Baker(s) and Anons

Baking class last night was on the DOUGH

So we discussed the dough and possible revisions, given recent developments like the need for more 'camo meming' (etc)

Some based memefags dropped by

and strongly advocated removing WAR Room section from the dough

in light of Q's recent posts

Bakers had been discussed war room section problems as well

Important to get everybody in the loop

before making a change like this

Discussion is CAPPED

Please read and then weigh in:

Should we remove WR section from the dough

Posting early-ish so we can discuss.

>>10703163

to clarify:

'War Room' is JUST this section (not all of page 3, kek)

>>10703242

Did you read the reasons why this was proposed?

Didn't come from the kitch

or from OSS

came from memefags from way back

the ones who were here before endchan got involved

their remarks make sense

if you want to make an objection, please address their arguments with ones of your own

>>10703163 proposal to remove War Room sectin

>>10703279 "FUCK OFF"

>>10703279 What is your argument for keeping War Room? FO isn't an argument

>>10703255

This is not about discouraging meming.

It's about learning to meme the way that Q is now pointing - not using #hashtags, etc, but rather camo memes. It's oldfag memefags who are leading the way.

>>10703163

>>10703333

>>10703322

>>10703322

>What the fuck do I have to do with this?

nothing if the discussion does not interest you

posting here in the interests of transparency

so that those who are interested can express their views

>>10703163

>>10703344

>I have been here over 2 years and do not remember a problem.

the "problem" is not a problem

it is a shift in strategy

see what memefags are saying in the CAP

also, the current War Room section was greatly modified by WR fags (gerbil and crew) in ways that are idiosyncratic to their approach - which is very in-your-face. That's not the approach Q is suggesting at this point - moar like conveying what we stand for while flying under the radar. No moar red text #qanon hashtags - moar like camo'd memes that can't be detected by new AI.

>>10703357

>>10703372

NO.

This didn't come from OSS.

Go look at the entire discussion, he wasn't there.

There is broad-based support for dropping the rah-rah-rah hit-em-hard approach to meming.

Both because it was too much the creation of one group (and really one person - s/grvl) and often embodies views that diverged from those of traditional memists who work from /qr/ not quanonresearch on /end/.

But the real impetus comes from Q's recent posts - which in turn are a response to new social media guieslines that will make it increasingly hard to use the same tactics that were used in the past.

It's a new era and calls for a new approach.