Anonymous ID: 738b38 Sept. 19, 2020, 7:14 p.m. No.10715934   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6084 >>6207

“Who Knows – They Give him a Big Fat Shot in the Ass and He Comes Out and He’s Better than Before” – Trump ROASTS Joe Biden in North Carolina

 

President Trump held another massive rally in North Carolina on Saturday night.

 

During the rally President Trump took on Joe Biden once again accusing the Democrat candidate of being on drugs which is likely.

 

President Trump already demanded the candidates be drug tested before each debate.

 

During Saturday night’s rally President Trump went after Joe Biden again.

 

President Trump: He has no idea where he is but I’d never say it. I won’t say it. I refuse. But, no, don’t underestimate him. He’s been doing this for 47 years. And I got a debate coming up with this guy. (applause) Who knows? You never know. You never know. They give him a big fat shot in the ass and he comes out and for two hours he’s better than ever before.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/knows-give-big-fat-shot-ass-comes-better-trump-roasts-joe-biden-north-carolina/

Anonymous ID: 738b38 Sept. 19, 2020, 7:16 p.m. No.10715958   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Too Much Centralization Is Turning Everything into a Political Crisis

 

Is American politics reaching a breaking point? A recent study by researchers from Brown and Stanford Universities certainly paints a grim picture of the state of the national discourse. The study attempts to measure “affective polarization,” defined as the extent to which citizens feel more negatively toward other political parties than their own, in nine developed countries, including the United States. The study authors concluded that affective polarization has risen much faster and more drastically in the United States than in any of the other countries they studied (figure 1). They then speculated on possible explanations of increasing polarization, suggesting that changing party composition, increasing racial division, and 24-hour partisan cable news are convincing possible causes. Notably, the research was completed before the coronavirus pandemic or the police killing of George Floyd, two events that have only deepened political division.

burkett-trends_in_affective_polarization_by_country.jpg

 

While the study is interesting and well written, the authors completely fail to consider a more fundamental potential explanation of increasing polarization, one that is likely to be understood well by libertarians and federalists, who have long railed against the trend toward ever more usurpation of local and state sovereignty in American politics. I propose that the real culprit behind worsening polarization is the gargantuan federal government that has turned the entire country into an unceasing political battleground. When virtually all political issues are settled at the national level, the whole nation becomes a source of potential political opponents. Centralization changes the scale and with it the locus of political debate and conflict. For the average political participant, it is probably true that people with differing ideas live near you, in your city or state, but the mathematical reality is that the vast majority of your political opponents live relatively far away (spread throughout the rest of the country) and thus have no material connection to your life or your community. Political opposition becomes just numbers on a cable news screen: 49 percent for this, 51 percent for that. Sixty-two million votes for one candidate, 65 million for another. These numbers, without names or faces, become simple objects; some are pawns to be moved around, while others are obstacles to be pushed aside. This is not just speculation: previous research has indicated that partisanship is correlated with the use of tactics to dehumanize political opponents. Centralized political decision-making amounts to a systematic dehumanization of anyone who might participate in the political process.

 

The effects of such a disastrous form of organization are already evident. Political polarization is not confined to academic papers, but has now manifested in the streets of Kenosha and Portland. As the 2020 election approaches, politically charged killings between members of rival factions will only become more likely. What was formerly a central promise of democratic politics—the peaceful transfer of power—has been abandoned in favor of direct action and blood.

 

https://mises.org/wire/too-much-centralization-turning-everything-political-crisis

Anonymous ID: 738b38 Sept. 19, 2020, 7:39 p.m. No.10716162   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6181

>>10716145

The 7 Noahide Laws: Universal Morality

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/62221/jewish/The-7-Noahide-Laws-Universal-Morality.htm

 

What are the Punishments for Transgressing the 7 Noahide Laws?

 

From Melachim uMilchamot – Chapter 9:14:

 

A gentile who transgresses these seven commands shall be executed by decapitation. For this reason, all the inhabitants of Shechem were obligated to die. Shechem kidnapped. They observed and were aware of his deeds, but did not judge him.

 

A gentile is executed on the basis of the testimony of one witness and the verdict of a single judge. No warning is required. Relatives may serve as witnesses. However, a woman may not serve as a witness or a judge for them.

 

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188354/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-9.htm

From Melachim uMilchamot – Chapter 9:2:

 

A gentile who worships false gods is liable provided he worships them in an accepted manner.

 

A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment. However, a gentile is not executed for a type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would not deem worthy of capital punishment. Nevertheless, even though a gentile will not be executed for these forms of worship, he is forbidden to engage in all of them.

 

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1188354/jewish/Melachim-uMilchamot-Chapter-9.htm

From Wikipedia:

 

The Talmud lists the punishment for blaspheming the Ineffable Name of God as death. The sons of Noah are to be executed by decapitation for most crimes,[25] considered one of the lightest capital punishments,[26] by stoning if he has intercourse with a Jewish betrothed woman,[27] or by strangulation if the Jewish woman has completed the marriage ceremonies, but had not yet consummated the marriage.[27]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

From the Talmud:

 

רב הונא ורב יהודה וכולהו תלמידי דרב אמרי על שבע מצות בן נח נהרג גלי רחמנא בחדא והוא הדין לכולהו

 

Rav Huna, Rav Yehuda, and all of the other students of Rav say: A descendant of Noah is executed for transgressing any of the seven Noahide mitzvot; the Merciful One revealed this punishment with regard to one mitzva, the prohibition of bloodshed, and the same is true with regard to all of them.

 

Punishment

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.57a.13?lang=bi

From Noahide.org:

 

Prospectives on Noahide Laws Chapter 5:

 

The Noahide laws are generally held to be so evident and normal that one cannot plead ignorance or lack of warning to be exempt from liability for their non-observance[40]. The theoretical punishment of the Torah for transgression of the Noahide laws is death, although such a penalty could only be enforced at a time when the great Sanhedrin, the Jewish High Court, convened in its place on the Temple Mount[41], and it seems that even when that was the case, this penalty was almost never carried out. The significance of the theoretical death penalty in general, whether for Jew or non-Jew, is given in the words of Rashi, namely that “one has transgressed the will of one’s Creator”[42]. In the case of the Noahide laws, it is that the very purpose for which a human was created, namely to settle the world peacefully has been contradicted and, and so also the essential point of the human being’s existence has been vitiated[43].

 

https://noahidelaw.com/punishment-for-transgressing-the-noahide-laws/

Anonymous ID: 738b38 Sept. 19, 2020, 7:41 p.m. No.10716184   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6211 >>6234

New documentary explores why a growing number of Americans are turning to socialism

 

Socialism has gone mainstream in American politics, but it remains deeply controversial. While some believe it offers an appealing solution to the country's woes, for others it conjures up fearful imagery of authoritarian regimes.

 

The new CBSN Originals documentary, "Speaking Frankly | Socialism," explores the resurgent interest in socialism and the culture wars surrounding its role in America today. [Watch the video in the player above.]

 

"The democratic socialist movement is being driven by millennials, zoomers, younger people," says Jabari Brisport, a Brooklyn teacher who embraces the socialist label and is running as a Democrat for a New York State Senate seat. "Younger people are interested in socialism because we can see so clearly the failings of capitalism."

 

A 2019 Pew Research Center survey found half of young adults under 30 expressed positive views of socialism — nearly as many as the 52% who felt positively about capitalism. Membership in the Democratic Socialists of America has jumped from 6,500 to 70,000 over the last six years.

 

But Maria Fernanda Bello, an activist with Young Americans Against Socialism, sees the trouble that's gripped her native Venezuela as a warning. "Socialists are always going to promise you free tuition, free health care, free everything, but they will never promise you freedom," she said.

 

CBSN Originals presents "Speaking Frankly | Socialism" is available to stream now in the video player above. It premieres on CBSN Sunday, September 20 at 8 p.m., 11 p.m. and 2 a.m. ET.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/socialism-in-america-2020-cbsn-originals/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab7e&linkId=100018146