Anonymous ID: cc3eee Sept. 19, 2020, 7:05 p.m. No.10715844   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5887

>>10715557

And Catholicism has historically sought to align religious faith with non-religious reasoning and philosophy. A SC judge can't be making decisions simply by citing the Bible. By contrast, Protestantism rebelled against that very aspect of Catholicism, turning towards direct Bible study and in evangelical Protestantism, the idea of personal relationships with God. That is all well and good, and some very smart people have followed these paths, but it doesn't do much for the Supreme Court as such.

Anonymous ID: cc3eee Sept. 19, 2020, 7:36 p.m. No.10716132   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10715573

I suspect they run "normie id's" in every bread, so they can reply as needed without drawing attention. Could be totally wrong, and my views on these things have been all over the place over time.