Anonymous ID: 532441 Sept. 19, 2020, 8:28 p.m. No.10716542   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6601

>>10716424

To be fair, he's not 'namefagging' but indicating that he has knowledge and experience in the area of law, which most anon, who aren't lawyers, appreciate.

I appreciate the input of lawfags, I'm sure others do, too. It's an additional perspective to consider, like if someone said "engineerfag here, this is what you're looking at"

>>10716506

TY

Anonymous ID: 532441 Sept. 19, 2020, 8:41 p.m. No.10716659   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6788 >>6829 >>6881

>>10716607

>>10716608

If you are never able to fail as a child, learn how to analyze what went wrong, make a determination of what could have gone better, you never learn to do that as an adult.

 

Same thing with arguments and arguing a point/idea.

 

Now they have this ludicrous cult of weakness: whose more damaged, more broken, more traumatized and that is what they revere and look up to instead of what struggles have been overcome, adversity they managed to defeat and power through.

 

It's really bizarro world.

It's why we see the world exactly opposite of them, too.

Anonymous ID: 532441 Sept. 19, 2020, 8:45 p.m. No.10716699   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10716601

You point is taken and I'm well aware of our history on this subject. You don't know me but you do. That's how anon works.

Again, imo, if an engineerfag posts something from their POV and expertise, I appreciate it since I'm not an engineer and will learn something.

But freedom is wonderful, we can see things differently and still work together well.