>hey PB
That's BP
>>>/comms/26525 Exposing Media Lies about Q: Post Attacks Against Q here
>>>/qrmemes/ New One-stop Meme Board, organized by topic
This is probably going to turn into a needless argument, but I'm curious why these threads can't just be on this board?
You can't use TOR on /comms/, and everyone namefags there. You're excluding a lot of people that aren't going to travel off of this board.
Also who is the board owner of /QRmemes/?
Memefarmer? Do you bake? When you travel outside this board you give the board owner your IP hash and other information about yourself. Anons deserve to know who they are giving that information too.
>>>/qrmemes/ >>10716404
New One-stop Meme Board, organized by topic
Atleast /QRmemes/ kinda make sense.. I guess
But this
>>>/comms/26525 Exposing Media Lies about Q: Post Attacks Against Q here
Could easily be another sticky on the main board. Why is there a sudden push to get anons to travel out side of /QR/?
First it was Endchan, then /WARROOM/ now trying to push anons to /comms/ and /QRmemes/
Why?
Which is why I won't get a response to the question.
Technique #6 - 'GAINING FULL CONTROL'
It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the 'ultimate victory' as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a 'honey pot' gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.
>Memefarmer? Do you bake? When you travel outside this board you give the board owner your IP hash and other information about yourself. Anons deserve to know who they are giving that information too.
>I baked about the time fastjack took over the board. Remember captcha every post? Nobody has my info about anything. There is one BV there, but IP I don't believe he can see. I am only an anon that seen the need to have a board for anons to put and take memes.
This isn't an answer. If anons travel to these boards the board owner gets there IP info. Rusty is the BO on Comms. Who are you?
>have long suspected rogue BVs of harvesting hashes in /comms and elsewhere so they can control the baking here.
Which is why they have blocked TOR access on /comms/
>I am only BOAnon, I don't have another name. I have not posted there under BOAnon. 8Kun made me make a name, and I thought it was best.
So you're an unnamed person you expect anons to give their IP information too, can you use /TOR/ on /QRmemes/? Or is it blocked there as well?
If you travel off this board you may not be as anon as you'd liked. Remember that.
>Comms is also used by anons to do a project or keep / archive material because it stays there for a long time. Here we're cluttering up the catalog and threads fall off quickly.
Hence the term Sticky. Not an argument.
This is false, I have screenshots of Rusty saying he could see IP hashes on /comms/
identifiable information
Which is why Rusty removed TOR posting on /comms/ you used to be able too.
>Ok, maybe there is way way I don't know about.
That was a quick change
>I really don't care to research how to find your IP.
Of course, why would anyone want to try to get anons IP hashes, not like /QRmemes/ didn't pop up right after /wr/ was removed
>That is what you are concerned about? Really? How about if you are not comfortable posting the memes then just don't post?
I have no plans to post anywhere but this board, I trust Q and he trusts fastjack.
No one knows you.
>8kun makes a hash out of IP addresses.
>
>It's not your actual IP address.
>
>If you're worried use a VPN
Great idea, and this is the disclaimer that should be in the dough to let every other anon know to use an IP.
>That is what you are concerned about? Really?
I'm concerned about infosec in an information warfare as should every Anon on this board.
>This is such a stoopid post. 8kun could shut down tomorrow, Q and anons would still exist.
irrelevant to this discussion. The question you should be asking is why Bakers are working hard to get anons to leave the mainboard and split off to /wr/ /qrmeme/ and /comms/ ? But you aren't interested in that answer, right?
>Generally accepted around here that if certain "agencies" really want to know, they will be able to find out.
I'm not worried about agencies, I'm concerned about outside actors and foreign governments cooperating with the deep state that can afford to pay people to be here as board owners and get people to leave /QR/ as they tried with Endchan/Warroom.
>I was just agreeing with you, if there is a way, I don't know, and I have no time or energy to spend on something like that. Feel free to post memes, or don't. It really doesn't matter to me.
So then you don't have a problem adding a disclaimer to the dough warning anons that they may not be secure if they travel outside this board, correct?
>opsec died in utah.
>
>there is no anonymity on Any Nets.
I'm not worried about the NSA. As has already been stated.
>Nobody is leaving QR. The new board is only an auxiliary resource to QR. Only a place to post and take memes. Your concern is misplaced.
So then you don't have a problem adding a disclaimer to the dough warning anons that they may not be secure if they travel outside this board, correct?
>Anons are just as secure there as they are here, no need for a disclaimer.
So then you don't have a problem adding a disclaimer to the dough warning anons that they may not be secure if they travel outside this board, correct?
Sure there is, no one knows you, you now know that I'm OSS and my input is there should be a disclaimer.
So then you don't have a problem adding a disclaimer to the dough warning anons that they may not be secure if they travel outside this board, correct?
Why would you guys be against a fair warning to other Anons, we all want to protect each, right? I didn't say it should be removed. This is a nice compromise.
The NSA works for POTUS, other do not. And if you are trying to say that nefarious parties wouldn't be interested in gaining control for information collection than your point is null.
>You are getting tiring now. if you have further questions go to the meta. I will answer, probably not tonight because its close to bed.
So then you don't have a problem adding a disclaimer to the dough warning anons that they may not be secure if they travel outside this board, correct?
This is my only question. Why avoid answering it.
o7
Maybe Q will weigh in on directing anons away from /qr/
>I am only an anon. BOAnon is what 8Kun made me make. Still only an anon. No need to know my name. Let the work show what it is.
So then you don't have a problem adding a disclaimer to the dough warning anons that they may not be secure if they travel outside this board, correct?
I did not. But I'd like to know your stance, why not just add a disclaimer.
>I will not add a disclaimer. Happy now?
I'm talking about the dough here. Not on your board.
>I will not add a disclaimer. Happy now?
I was never unhappy to begin with, I am only interested in protecting Anons. You'll know when I'm unhappy.
>would also suggest a peruse of class #32 for moar convo, deflecting straight answers sets off muh alarms, just sayin
I didn't deflect a straight answer. I asked a question that went unanswered to begin with.
Plan on it, no offense meant to you, I just don't trust anyone.
And just so we're all clear, I was the only one saying Endchan was trying to raid our board months ago and divert anons there.
Howdid that turn out?
>That is your problem. I understand that trust is earned, but not gonna namefag myself. Let the board speak for itself.
Exactly, so you agree the board needs to be made aware of the risk so that they can speak for it. Correct?
>what risk?
That if they travel to your board or /comms/ they run the risk of having their infomration harvested.
Will check it out. Just saying we've seen similar playbooks before and the bread on /comms/ could easily be stickied here.
>I would expect is the same risk they take when they go to QR. There really is no difference.
The difference is you, everyone including Q knows Fastjack. Q verified fastjack. No one has verified you. I would think to avoid this you would be all for the idea of letting anons know the risk.
To be even more honest, the kitchen meta should be stickied here.