Anonymous ID: 81788d Sept. 19, 2020, 9:13 p.m. No.10717065   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7081 >>7096 >>7147

>>10717020 PB

 

Exactly, no one knows you. And instead of trying to help the situation you're just repeating don't worry about it over and over..

 

This seems like the exact play Endchan /warroom/ would pull. They know they lost /WR/ so just make a new board under something else

 

>>10717020 PB

>No you weren't. Anyone who was on endchan back then and here now spoke up, too.

 

Yea? I still have all the archives of myself arguing with all the other bakers about what was happening and being told over and over I was wrong and shill. Can post next bread if you like.

Anonymous ID: 81788d Sept. 19, 2020, 9:16 p.m. No.10717099   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7109

>>10717081

>WR wasn't always an Endchan thing.

/warroom/ board was absolutely an Endchan thing, and it all steamed from the endchan raid and their attempt to gain control here.

 

I'm not talking about warroom section.

Anonymous ID: 81788d Sept. 19, 2020, 9:18 p.m. No.10717114   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7170

>>10717096

>What do you want, my full name with middle initial? Why is this so difficult? I thought we are supposed to be anons.

No, I want you to say your ok with anons being informed that if they travel to your board they may be giving you access to information they may not want you to have. Doesn't seem so difficult, right? You're probably a patriot, but anons should be apprised of the possibility of a risk. That's all.

Anonymous ID: 81788d Sept. 19, 2020, 9:22 p.m. No.10717155   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10717138

>Yeah, I'm just nearly positive we've had a warroom since before anyone even named grvl, so I'm back to thinking it's just you.

We had a warroom section in the dough and on /QR/ a thread. GRVL made the /WARROOM/ board which was inserted into our dough after they had raided our board and inserted direct links to endchan. Once again I still have the archives if you'd like to see where you are incorrect.

Anonymous ID: 81788d Sept. 19, 2020, 9:23 p.m. No.10717159   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7216

>>10717147

>Every anon will make their own choice and I respect that.

Does every anon know the risk is a possibility? You're not interesting in protecting the less aware or newfags?