Anonymous ID: c1687d Sept. 19, 2020, 9:21 p.m. No.10717147   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7159

>>10717065

I don't need your screenshots to know what happened. I don't argue with bakers, but I did speak up when gerbil was trying to split the board.

I also don't see any need to discuss this any more.

Every anon will make their own choice and I respect that.

Anonymous ID: c1687d Sept. 19, 2020, 9:24 p.m. No.10717173   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7196

>>10717138

That is correct. The original war room person is a European lady, totally different from gerbil. And she was here since /cbts/. She had an ongoing thread on the board, and really helped anons a lot. Totally different person, knowledgebase/skill set (she has a degree in social marketing), approach and temperament.

 

I don't know why this is an ongoing discussion over multiple threads. It's a bit weird.

Anonymous ID: c1687d Sept. 19, 2020, 9:29 p.m. No.10717216   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7227 >>7235 >>7461

>>10717159

I'm not interested in this discussion with you. There will be no more replies.

 

>>10717157

Please remember to put either lb (last bread) or pb (prior/previous bread) on links, otherwise it really messes up people who are phonefagging. It's a courteous thing to do.

TY.

 

>>10717196

She helped us break the internet and the term "Russian bot" was created for us. So that is something.

Anonymous ID: c1687d Sept. 19, 2020, 9:41 p.m. No.10717335   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7389 >>7440

>>10717233

You would benefit from reading the spreadsheet from the beginning - it has a LOT of info that anons found, especially at the beginning

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Efm2AcuMJ7whuuB6T7ouOIwrE_9S-1vDJLAXIVPZU2g

Anonymous ID: c1687d Sept. 19, 2020, 9:45 p.m. No.10717384   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7429 >>7467

>>10717235

Not really, I helped her in her warroom thread, she mentioned where she was from and that she has a degree in social media. The thread was pretty slow (compared to the Generals). Memefarmer helped her, too. We both make memes, so that was a logical thing to do for us - check in with her and see what is working & not, brainstorm and come back with different memes.

 

I would say that I know memefarmer personally, though not names, obviously. It's just that we collaborated a lot, recognize each other and work well together.

Anonymous ID: c1687d Sept. 19, 2020, 9:53 p.m. No.10717472   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7494 >>7496 >>7537

>>10717272

Memefarmer didn't direct anything other than collecting the memes, naming, resizing, optimizing them and uploading them to the mega account. So, basically only doing that function and anyone else who volunteered to help with that particular task.

 

War room lady didn't direct anyone either, she just planned out a campaign after careful research, made suggestions to anons in the General thread, kept tabs on it (what was working and not) and suggested changes in direction when needed, and kept tabs on that. It was a great feedback loop and it worked incredibly well.

 

Different anons have different tasks and so use the title of the task as an identifier for that purpose only. You would never know when memefarmer or any other task-anon, posted something else because the task-id wasn't necessary… only when performing that task or making a post about that task. So, contrary to this odd assertion/obsession tonight (not you), it's not "namefagging" at all, since it's only used when performing functions of that task, not any other time, and it's not a name but a task-ID.

 

>>10717429

Absolutely right.

Some anons volunteer for a task and do it out of love of God & Country and also make great friends along the way - so for other anons, too.

Anonymous ID: c1687d Sept. 19, 2020, 10:05 p.m. No.10717554   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10717461

You didn't know before, and now you do, and now you know why (which helps). We all learn every day. Anons help each other.

 

>>10717440

<you'f веи ряомотеđ.

I'm now 2nd lowest ranking anon!

woo!

 

>>10717494

I don't understand what you mean by that.

Which 'they' and by whom?

 

>>10717496

That's how we work together. Even encouragement helps. Every anon sharing is a force multiplier.

Anonymous ID: c1687d Sept. 19, 2020, 10:20 p.m. No.10717644   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Popular Children's App Allegedly Requests Minor To Take Naked Pictures

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/shocking-claim-popular-childrens-app-requests-minor-take-naked-pictures

 

A shocking claim, made by one parent in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, alleges a popular smartphone app designed for children asked a 5-year-old user to take naked pictures of themselves and siblings while in the bathroom and threatened to strangle the child if they didn't comply, reported WBAL Baltimore.

 

Anne Arundel County police learned about the incident on Wednesday (Sept. 16), said the child had several apps "Talking Angela," "Talking Angela 2", Talking Tom 2", and "Talking Ben 2" on their smartphone device. The complaint, filed by one of the parents, though the report did not specify which one (mother or father), called police after the incident. Police are now warning parents in the county, just outside Washington, D.C., to monitor their children's online activity of apps and social media.

 

"The parent reported that the app requested the child remove clothing and take photos while in the bathroom," Anne Arundel County police Sgt. Kam Cooke said. "We are not really sure as to, did the app actually say that? Or was that some sort of other entity within that app that was able to request that?"

 

WBAL downloaded the popular apps but did not find "any verbal commands, only written messages or symbols pointing out what to do next."

 

The local television station interviewed one parent in the county, Victoria Rodriguez, who said she would not let her young kids use smartphone apps.

 

"I feel it's weird, like someone is watching my child through the game or through the camera. It gives me the heebie-jeebies," Rodriguez said.

 

A Patch report said the tech company behind the app, Outfit7, has denied the claims:

 

"The claims have no factual basis and are completely untrue," company spokesperson Daša Rankel told Patch in an email.

 

However, one of the apps, Talking Tom, was in hot water in 2015 in the U.K., after the Advertising Standards Authority received complaints from two parents that their 7-year-old and 3-year-old children saw porno ads on the app. One ad read," "Wanna f**k?"

 

Besides police warning about apps possibly requesting children to take pictures of themselves and or others, there's been a massive problem of hackers disrupting virtual classes for children with porn, guns, and threats, all across the country.