>pure lies, genetics of seed determine strength, nothing else
moron, I'm not saying all lab grown is high THC. Stop being triggered or just being a clown shill. There ARE strains that never existed in nature that are purposefully breeded for high THC.
>Why do you even need to grow it in a lab in the first place? Works pretty good just grown naturally.
I mean lab in a general sense. Nature's lab with man's hand guiding counts also…
>Is it just convenient for me to agree with them on this one issue because I smoke pot?
Maybe…maybe not. Honest examination like this is the minimum requisite. We've got a bunch of addicts, leftists, and/or shills in the forum tonight blanket defending all strains of MJ…
CBD may have some positives. THC is pure entertainment at low levels though. I'd be more for legalization of psilocybin microdosing before anything MJ related. Mushroom studies are exponentially safer, more effective, and everything compared with any of the illegal drugs out there…
religious-sounding dogma from the MJ cult in Shasta…
>Mushrooms hit way harder perceptually than Cannabis hands down fren. You trying to help people lose their minds?
I agree. Read it again. I said "microdosing".
But also, read the studies. perception side affects with mushrooms are nil compared with the numbers of people that have at minimum issues with paranoia with THC.
A sample. The CDC, I think but could have been another big agency, did a huge overview study in 2011 that I read back then.
Notice the difference in the second image between cannabis and synthetic cannabis…
investigate further. Some of the stuff developed in the last decades is not your grandpa's cannabis.
>TY Baker
>If your body isn't built for ingesting a particular plant, don't ingest (or inhale).
Tell that to reindeer.
>I only listen to Dr. Fauci.
Glow happens.
>It's the Exit Gate out of the fucking Matrix.
Pot is the gateway drug of exiting the Matrix drugs. Upgrade to shroom microdosing…you can thank me later.
>Still Trust a plant more than pharmaceuticals… So has the nutrient content of OTHER plants gotten better also or just the pot? A perennial plant?
Maybe you're still out on the farm and/or have little knowledge of chemicals. Lots of strains are manipulated to produce unnaturally high THC levels. This correlates with lots of people having psychological problems that we're an issue with natural maryjane. That's all I'm saying.
If you stop thinking, I'll have you defending meth-laced weed by the end of this…
For the record, I don't consent to the cabal clown world, but I do consent to watching them hang. I require front row tickets, and I am happy to pay for them.
>So tell me more about how crossbreeding strains of plants can produce so much THC it kills you?
I didn't say it kills you. Wrong anon…
I miswrote. The problems with the new weed are not in the old weed, or at least not as prevelant. I am distinguishing the new from the old. Sorry, not sorry, if that digs into your bottom line and strain patents for a plant that can grow FREELY in most places…
QUESTIONING ARTIFICIALLY HIGH THC MARIJUANA TRIGGERS SHILLS. DIG. FOLLOW THE MONEY!
>ImNL them study caps look like they from the 90s… but I get the drift the DEA has some statistics based on information collected through public interaction with people on these substances.
The studies were comprehensive. There are lots more than just crime or hospital correlations. There are social, familial, genetic, psychological, long term effects, etc. bases on lots of studies. and not from the 90s. The most recent one I am aware of is from 2011…and I read it back then too, so I don't have the link readily available.
>Good grief people this is still the chans (hard to tell sometimes). Many autists use cannabis/shrooms and they ain't gonna stop anytime soon. If you wanna talk about bad dope, talk about meth. Most destructive drug there is.
Yes, be a good sheep. Don't question the money, genetic engineering, government regulation and tax control in the marijuana agenda.
>Did anon state the DEA Generated some studies or 'Has' Some studies…
In general, there are lots of sources for studies…wasn't referring to DEA.