>>10721366

You don't think a law degree is required to sit on the highest COURT in the country?

ARE YOU NUTS?

Of course you would need a law degree!!

>>10721428

Kind of dangerous though, IMO.

I would prefer someone who has a decent understanding of the Constitution of course but also the case law here, which is a side bar to Constitution. That is much more involved and complicated.

>>10721426

Agreed. We don't need an ignorant monkey interpreting the Constitution for us.

>>10721410

Thanks for bringing that sauce Frens.

I'm not so arrogant to claim to know everything. I suppose it would be within our countries principles to have it this way.

IMO, it would be a bit dangerous to seat someone who doesn't have a complete understanding of our laws, case law and Constitutional law.

Thank you for the SAUCE!