>>>10725040, >>10725080, >>10725092, >>10725171, >>10725183 Freaks in the Flesh 'Warning-Graphic' "Needs sauce…" + "Highest Classification…"(Caps)
Sauceless Bullshit
AND CURRENT BAKER HAS DISCRETION TO CLEARLY MARK OR REFERENCE IT AS UNSAUCED IN NEXT NOTABLES
So that kills the 'not touching other bakers dough' answer (even if I respect the sentiment)
No animosity, no hate for bakers - just a solution to a problem, which I'm sure you'll respect.
Even lamestream fake news does retractions….
>Kek. If you watch it every time he says ‘ahh’ you gotta take a shot of whiskey.
…would put 99% of Americans (the World) in a HOSPITAL.
Since when did sauceless crap qualify for notables? Das right, never.
Quality notables over quantity.
Both bakers have solutions to correct, I've said my piece, I'll let your actions speak.