>>10727638 PB Nominating as notable from last bread.
Short educational vid by Devan Nunes on the history of Antifa.
Informative for New eyes just waking up who need some background on the History of Antifa. Simple, 5 minute to the point, background, origins and the objectives of Antifa that remain the same throughout their history.
There were many omitted, but for good reason. Any graduate in History can tell you that in order to be included as history to use in a classroom, or to be considered a "history book" ancient documents must be able to pass the "Historicity test.
This test is ancient and was used at the time the bible was put together after the death of Christ.
The test requires that any document put in the bible had to have a number of identical copies without any changes, each coming from a different underground Church. If there were multiple identical copies, they were put in the Bible as historical documents for passing the test after 300 years of time between the death of Christ and their assembly.
The books that came from different churches, but were altered (meaning there were multiple copies but each different, so no one could tell what the original copy was) had to be excluded as history, for not passing the historicity test.
Then, there are the books that are heretical, meaning someone took the liberty to write pretending they were one of the apostles to garner themselves some power and fame, but, there are only one copy of each of these, and therefore they also fail the test. No ability to prove they are not frauds.
So, when you look at the Bible, you are looking at something that was prepared by ancient educated historical scholars, who did not allow any scrolls in the bible that could not pass a modern historicity test at a University today.
And it is most interesting that even today, out of all of the ancient texts we have, the Bible passes the historicity test at ten times the identical copies than any other book considered a historical work suitable for teaching as history, such as Homer's Illiad.
If the bible is not a history book, then we can not consider any other ancient scrolls a history book because none of them pass the historicity test better than this ancient 66 scrolls assembled into a text.
I can help you with this.
For the real bible, you need to study the original in Hebrew, Greek, bits of Aramaic. While doing this, if you do not speak either ancient language, use the 1611 King James as a crutch to the English, but understand that no translation is capable of translating out what God actually wrote. All translations lose more than half of the message. All.
Why?
Here are the reasons:
1) The Hebrew is the most sophisticated code language ever developed by mankind. Each letter is like a painted single Chinese word, except that each letter can stand for a noun, pronoun, verb, etc. Which word is determined by CONTEXT with the other letters, such that one hebrew word can be a whole sentence.
For Example: The Name of God in Hebrew is YHWH or read HWHY if read properly right to left.
H means window, to BEHOLD, or breath or breeze or spirit.
W means hand from the elbow down.
Y means nail or hook.
The name of God then has a sentence in it":
"Behold the hand, Behold the nail".
This sentence is not in the English version where letters alone are never whole words. Much of the MetaCoding in the original text is lost when it is translated.
To learn about how to spot these in the original, using the 1611 King James I HIGLY suggest the 24 hour segmented course by the late Chuck Missler, who takes you through examples of meta codes, and macrocodes, how the Bible uses "future proves past" and then:… THE MATH in the original is VERY important for proving the existence of God himself.
2) Each Hebrew letter and each greek letter is like a Roman Numeral system. The hebrews and Greeks also used their letters for their numbers. As a result, the original bible can be flipped into NOTHING but a book of numbers.
There, in the original you will find something called the Hepatic structure of the text, where moving even one letter would destroy the mathematical division of sevens behind the text. One letter moved, and the words in designated places will no longer be divisible by SEVEN EXACTLY without remainder. This structure was discovered by a Russian Mathematician named Ivan Pannin. Not a letter in the original text can be moved.
ALSO due to the numbers, you can bet God, who is the ultimate mathematician, worked with those numbers and placed them exactly where they needed to be to point to future mathematical discoveries not known at the time of the writing of the text.
To this sciencefag, the bible is no longer some ancient text that has been translated and changed. This scientist views this assembly of ancient scrolls a total ENIGMA…. a most astounding miracle mix of words, math, and code beyond the capacity of any computer today to create.
Just the facts.
Check out the course that can help you get started on the REAL book that the creator of the universe wrote with his own intellect, for us to explore to our amazement.
I will ever be dumbfounded by this writing.
I am and will be forever indebted to Chuck Missler for leaving us the keys to this most incredible ancient text.
He did a course that takes you from the first book to the last of the 66 books, that opens these wonders in the original languages, and it can be done an hour a day, in 24 days… less than a month.
Learn the Bible in 24 Hours.
Best bible course ever, especially for scientists and computer experts.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRj8AJuzeJRwHdeFua3pzmwPB_JCS0mIq
Here is a TL:DR on my long post.
Once you get through the first 5 hours of that course by Missler, it becomes PAINFULLY obvious why (((they))) do NOT want ANYONE reading it in the original languages.
Incredible.
Of course it would. Cool part is, because each of the letters is a picture, and the pictures go together to make a word, it is one of the easiest languages to learn.
Example.
Aleph, is our letter A. IT looks like a ground line with a tent. It means house (what it looks like)
The letter that corresponds to our English letter B looks like a bull with horns. It means bull, or leader.
The Hebrew word for father is Abba
It is composed of A and B meaning leader of the house.
Much of the Hebrew code is like this.
Dearest Anon,
The translations are nothing but crutches for the populations that can not read the original. They are irrelivant. We have the original.
See:
And then see:
>Utter nonsense. This is precisely the type of nerdish neurotic obfuscant diddling that Christ warned against. It is an example of the unspiritual, using intellectual fetishization, to proclaim themselves authority of God's Law.
I am afraid not, anon.
Problem is, you can prove what I said, to yourself with a simple calculator. Jesus could do math, and God… well he is the primary form of conciousness, who is a wizzard beyond your capacity to imagine. And yet, he left us a text written in two languages. One the greatest most sophisticated code language. The second the most precice language ever developed, with multiple tenses beyond other languages, so that the New Testament interprets the Old with extreme precision, while the Old testaments contains the code, hidden information, and yes, the formulas for everything from Pi, to the natural log^e not discovered until 1400's or so. So.
All you need is a calculater to figure out:
"How many times until it is mathematically impossible"
By the way, Q uses proofs exactly the way God uses them.
Mathematical probabilities (and each letter in the original is a number)
And "Future proves past"
Even Q's style of proof is Biblical.
Anons should check it out… figure out what Q has already figured out… mathematically (Biblically) speaking.
I am glad that we had a real scientist, and computer expert tear that original apart and ride it side by side with the ancient King James.
Most remarkable thing about the King James is the King himself, getting so ticked off about English having only one version of YOU for the single and the plural. So… what does he do?
He uses thee, thou, thy for the singular, and You, your, yours for the plural, if someone is speaking to a crowd.
King James has also been combed through for ages. We know where all of the mistranslated sentences are very well. I think Missler said there were eleven? Cant quite remember, but, scholars know them well.
King James is also not required to change the sentences due to copyright law either.
Pure English and pure attempted word for word translation. VERY good for using when working with the original Hebrew and Greek versions. Latin versions also help.
By the two relating, do you mean the Old Testament in the Hebrew and the New Testament in the Greek?