>>1072720
I'm still laughing...@Snowden didn't bolt anywhere!
I actually had an anon respond to my post the other day (when I was pointing out that I had used 5 Eyes to try and lay the foundation for @Snowden's "innocence" over the last 2 months) tell me he still thought @Snowden was a rogue actor -- in spite of knowing this fact -- and the only reason he was doing what he's been doing is because he was "caught" and had to flip.
Now I'm guessing part of the reason he thinks @Snowden is "rogue" in the first place is because of this information that was reported 5 years ago.
So let me get this straight: How can 5 Eyes (which has always been a really, BAD IDEA in terms of having foreign governments spying on us) be deemed "good news to learn" when it comes from Q Team, and YET, traitorous when coming from @Snowden 5 years ago?
Illogical. To say the least.