From wiki…
Wisconsin state law 948.60(2)(a) states: "Any person under 18 years of age who possesses
or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor."
There are exceptions, of course, but I doubt any of those will apply here based on the entry
contained therein.
>There's no "intent" needed. They don't even have to prosecute him for "murder".
It absolutely changes. And I clarified as well…
First of all, your first 2 points become moot as they both involve IL law, and your third point
goes from felony possession of a firearm to misdemeanor possession of a firearm. That's
a game changer.
>>>10738918
>>There's no "intent" needed. They don't even have to prosecute him for "murder".
>It absolutely changes. And I clarified as well…
>First of all, your first 2 points become moot as they both involve IL law, and your third point
>goes from felony possession of a firearm to misdemeanor possession of a firearm. That's
>a game changer.
So now they likely will have to prove intent, because it's not felony murder.
Looks like Mickey's penis.
>Well, your argument has gone from "He was in the right, fucker!"
Cite where I said he was in the right.
>to "It wasn't a felony, it was a misdemeanor, fucker!"
Which is a game changer, since it's no longer felony murder. Not felony murder means intent
is required. Not sure why this is hard.
>How much further do you want to take this?
Until you admit my first comment was correct, because it was. You started out sane, but seem
to have dropped off the deep end of "i'm right, regardless, and you must believe me… regardless."
>Laws were broken all around by both sides.
Never said there weren't. Maybe you're confusing me with one of the other anons
you quoted arbitrarily?
>Both were in the wrong, and the best argument you all have is "Well, his reasons were patriotic and shiet".
Actually, my argument was that maybe he's guilty of a crime, but not intentional homicide.
>Kyle contributed to lawlessness as much as antifa did. It wasn't heroic. It was barely self-defense. It was definitely stupid.
I never said otherwise. Maybe language is hard for you?
>Well, your argument has gone from "He was in the right, fucker!"
Cite where I said he was in the right.
>to "It wasn't a felony, it was a misdemeanor, fucker!"
Which is a game changer, since it's no longer felony murder. Not felony murder means intent
is required for 1st degree homicide. Not sure why this is hard.
>How much further do you want to take this?
Until you admit my first comment was correct, because it was. You started out sane, but seem
to have dropped off the deep end of "i'm right, regardless, and you must believe me… regardless."
>Laws were broken all around by both sides.
I never said they weren't. Maybe you're confusing me with one of the other anons
you quoted arbitrarily?
>Both were in the wrong, and the best argument you all have is "Well, his reasons were patriotic and shiet".
That wasn't my argument. In fact, my argument was that maybe he's guilty of a crime, but not intentional homicide.
>Kyle contributed to lawlessness as much as antifa did. It wasn't heroic. It was barely self-defense. It was definitely stupid.
I never said otherwise. Maybe language is hard for you?
No, still a misdemeanor. A quick search on wiki will yield the relevant statute. Under 18…
>you are saying he did something illegal.
Possession of a long gun under the age of 18 in WI is a crime.
>so what charges were brought?
Several, most of which I expect will be amended or dropped, eventually.
>and whatever happened to innocent till proven guilty.
I haven't ever said he was convicted of anything.
>you say he 'commited' without saying 'alledged'
Whatever. Pedantry is so boring.
>you point in repeating what you know is a slander?
Not really. But you don't care about that anyway.
>what is it?
Proving how much of a retard you are.
>you have none except to cause problems.
By pointing out how the kid is likely going to be exonerated? You're kind of stupid, aren't you?
>you don't get to magically decide who is guilty.
I never did. Maybe you don't know how the quote function works in here.
>you are not a prosecutor.
I don't have to be to offer an opinion, anonymously on an imageboard.
>you say he 'committed a mistdomenor'
I said possession of a long gun by a person under 18 is a misdemeanor. Learn language.
>I think you're a bit overly attached to this young adults story.
I think you are. I also say you can't read.
>in the insterest of him getting a fair trial, if it gets that far, you should stand down your rethoric.
What rhetoric, your imagination?
>or don't youc are about that? Is it all politics to you?
???
>you dn't care about a young man, caught up in the situation, defending himself?
I'm defending him. Learn to read.
>a kid who could be going to college . . . is instead having to deal with charges.
Yeah, life sucks. And you can't read.
>but no, you don't see him. You see a political issue.
The dude can't read what I wrote anyway. He's probably the same retard replying to my comments
from another UID, too.
Um, the wiki sauce cites the relevant statute dumbass. FFS, can't you fuckers read?
Fuck people like this are stupid >>10739284
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/60/2/a
It took 2 seconds to cite the statute REFERENCED ON WIKI you fucking ignorant retard.
There's at least one theory out there that says her account has already been taken over by white
hats. Most of the shit she posts these days isn't incorrect, just depends upon your viewpoint.
Same with a bunch of other accounts…
FFS, it was directly listed in the link I posted you fucking retard. How the fuck do you figure out how
to breathe every morning when you wake up if you're THAT FUCKING STUPID.
>FFS, it was directly listed in the link I posted you fucking retard. How the fuck do you figure out how
>to breathe every morning when you wake up if you're THAT FUCKING STUPID.
Waaaahhh, I can't be bothered to look up a fucking statute BECAUSE I'M TOO FUCKING
STUPID TO USE A COMPUTER!
Fuck, you people are like retard incarnated…
Better than the gore porn faggot from back in the chan days.
Fair enough…
>And she parrots whatever the voice in her ear tells her.
Best guess, that voice is Trump. She's a goat, but why is the answer… comped, patriot, hard to say.
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/60/2/a
>12-13 may possess firearm when accompanied by an adult, or while transporting cased/unloaded firearm to/from Hunter Safety class, or in Hunter Safety class. 14-16 is the same as 12-13, except Hunter Safety graduates can hunt and possess firearms (rifles/shotguns) without adult supervision.
Right, and you're saying that he was transporting a firearm to/from a Hunter Safey Class… or hunting?
Even Kyle admitted that's not what he was doing. You might be a special kind of stupid.