>>10738872 (pb)
you are saying he did something illegal.
so what charges were brought?
and whatever happened to innocent till proven guilty.
you say he 'commited' without saying 'alledged'
you point in repeating what you know is a slander?
what is it?
you have none except to cause problems.
you don't get to magically decide who is guilty.
you are not a prosecutor.
you say he 'committed a mistdomenor'
you failed to say alledged.
I think you're a bit overly attached to this young adults story.
in the insterest of him getting a fair trial, if it gets that far, you should stand down your rethoric.
or don't youc are about that? Is it all politics to you?
you dn't care about a young man, caught up in the situation, defending himself?
a kid who could be going to college . . . is instead having to deal with charges.
but no, you don't see him. You see a political issue.
not even bothering reading it.
I know what you about.
you need to disengage.
the kid is an aside.
this is one who likes fights.
he disrespect the law by talking smack and spreading slander.
and then he tells you you can't read.
what reason other than to just start fights and be a pest would this person be posting?
I can't think of one.
he will insult me again.
life to everyone worthy.
you've pic the wrong anon to do your hateful troll crap to.
situationally clueless.
namefagging is bad not because anon want bad things to happen to namefags, they do not want that!
We want name fags to be safe and well.
and if they are sick, we want them to get cured.
there are other reasons.
anon still love the people.
One day I jokingly called . . . a famefag and he chimed right in.
"I'm here, what do you want?" he asked.
I had already posted a comment saying 'of course I know . . . is not a fame fag'
All I could do was post a 'thank you'.
I'd be more affectionate but . . . well Cody does that so I don't have to.