Anonymous ID: 2139e0 Sept. 22, 2020, 1:08 a.m. No.10741376   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1413 >>1415 >>1441 >>1514

Looks like there is a need to correct RBG's record.

Several attempts to clear her of recommending a change in

the age of consent. FALSE???

 

Looks like she inspired the government funded study

about how to correct the sex/gender based language

in the U.S. code

 

Might have gone a little too far by deciding for us

what age we protect our children from predators.

I don't think the concepts promoted were the student assistants.

I don't think the concepts were too far from RBG's own hand.

Seems she would have corrected this before publication.

Anonymous ID: 2139e0 Sept. 22, 2020, 1:24 a.m. No.10741441   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1474

>>10741376

 

link to the pdf

https://www2.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12se9.pdf

 

link to testimony submitted at RBG's confirmation hearing

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-4-19-.pdf

https://archive.is/USqSR

TESTIMONY RE: RUTH BADER GINSBURG

by: Susan Hirschmann, Executive Director Eagle Forum

To the Senate Judiciary Committee

July 23, 1993

 

Ruth Bader Ginsburg's writings show her to be a radical, doctrinaire feminist, far out of the mainstream. She shares the chip-on-the-shoulder, radical feminist view that American women have endured centuries of oppression and mistreatment from men.

(excerpt) and with feminist Simone de Beauvoir's put-down of women as "the second sex." (De Beauvoir's most famous guote is, "Marriage is an obscene

bourgeois institution."

 

Of course, Ginsburg passed President Clinton's selfproclaimed litmus test for appointment to the Supreme Court — she is "pro-choice." But that's not all; she wants to write taxpayer funding of abortions into the U.S. Constitution, something that 72% of Americans oppose and even the pro-abortion, pro-Roe v. Wade Supreme Court refused to do.

 

In a 1980 book entitled Constitutional Government in America. Judge Ginsburg wrote a chapter endorsing taxpayer funding of abortions as a constitutional right and condemning the high Court's rulings.

 

Her radical views are made clear in a book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, which she coauthored in 1977 with another feminist, Brenda Feigen-Fasteau, for which they were paid with federal funds under Contract No. CR3AK010.

 

Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, was the source of the claim widely made in the 1970s that 800 federal laws "discriminated" on account of sex. The 230-page book was written to identify those laws and to recommend the specific changes demanded by the feminist movement in order to conform to the "equality principle" and promote ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, for which Ginsburg was a fervent advocate. (The ERA died in 1982.)

 

Sex Bias in the U.S. Code is a handbook which shows how the feminists want to change our laws, our institutions and our attitudes, and convert America into a "gender-free" society. It clearly shows that the feminists are not trying to redress any legitimate grievances women might have, but want to change human nature, social mores, and relationships between men and women — and want to do that by changing our laws.

 

Here are some of the extremist feminist concepts from the Ginsburg book, Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: . . . in the Military

  1. Women must be drafted when men are drafted.

  2. Women must be assigned to military combat duty.

. . . in Moral Standards

  1. The age of consent for sexual acts must be lowered to 12 years old.

"Eliminate the phrase 'carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years' and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense. . .

A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, . . . [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old." (p. 102)

  1. Prostitution must be legalized: it is not sufficient to change the law to sex-neutral language.

"Prostitution proscriptions are subject to several constitutional and policy objections.

 

Prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of

privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions." (p. 97)

  1. The Mann Act must be repealed; women should not be protected from "bad" men.

"The Mann Act . . . prohibits the transportation of women and girls for prostitution, debauchery, or any other immoral purpose. The act poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form.

  1. Prisons and reformatories must be sex-integrated.

. . . in Education

  1. Sinale-sex schools and colleges, and sinale-sex school and college activities must be sex-integrated.

  2. All-boys' and all-girls' organizations must be sexintegrated because separate-but-equal organizations perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.

  3. Fraternities and sororities must be sex-integrated

  4. The Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts, and other Congressionallvchartered youth organizations, must change their names and their purposes and become sex-integrated

  5. The 4-H Bovs and Girls Clubs must be sex-integrated into 4-H Youth Clubs.

6- Men and women should be required to salute the flag in the same wav.

. . . in the Family

  1. The traditional family concept of husband as breadwinner and wife as homemaker must be eliminated

  2. The Federal Government must provide comprehensive government child-care.

 

Specifically, she said that the abortion right is, in her words, essential to women's equality and dignity. She said, furthermore, that when government controls that decision for a woman, she is being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for her own choices.

Anonymous ID: 2139e0 Sept. 22, 2020, 1:50 a.m. No.10741514   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10741376

 

analyze the pic:

 

forcing women to become like men ?

 

on this subject:

In the grand scheme of things, men are strength and protection.

Like it or don't like it, women depend on men.

Women raping men is not a common crime.

Men raping women IS.

Why? because men are busting out with strong hormones

Female hormones are more gentle and nurturing. (for instance, a baby's cries will cause a nursing mother's breasts to fill)

Women have a smaller body frame

and aren't suited to hard labor

while men are capable of greater work loads

 

This makes women more suitable

to care for small children.

A mother wants to know all the events of a child's life

so she can better understand how to nurture.

Things happen that need explanations.

If a child is in preschool

and especially if the child can't speak well

there is a loss of proper care for the child.

 

Strength should manifest as a good strength.

Men should be given respect for their protective role

and have a bigger role in deciding life choices for the family.

Women have always had a protective role

for children's nurturing.

both have traits suited best to them

 

but by God Almighty

if there was danger

it would fall on men to do the ugly stuff

and so he should make those decisions

the decisions that may result in the need

for a man to protect and defend